Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes you need to look at a file straight out of the camera and you need an Exif Viewer that shows the Fujifilm specific fields.

Most of these fields (including the shutter count) are not documented by Fujifilm and not displayed by viewers that only show basic EXIF.

Unless you are going to actually parse up the binary file you are going to trust a viewer of some sort.

If you want to look at the raw exif data without uploading your file to a remote web site you can use this:

Fujifilm Exif Viewer

If you click on the plus sign top left you can load an image file into your browser (jpg or raw).

The default view shows you the image and interpreted metadata - but if you right click and choose the EXIF option it shows you the entire list of EXIF tags - including Fujifilm specific - and the raw data without decoding.

Scroll down and look at tag 1438 which is the field normally interpreted as shutter (or image) count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always been curious about this shutter count issue, and why it's more difficult on a Fujifilm. Sincere thanks to all three of you for divulging this top secret information, and sharing the availability of web-based tools to do this, and especially Greybeard for his app, which displays information in such a well organized fashion. Clearly a standout feature.

I use five or six graphics programs with exif capabilities, and none of them display shutter count. In fact, all of them display the exif data in formats different from one another. 

After spending a couple hours researching exif protocol, I discovered most of us already have a tool right at our fingertips that displays information nearly as nice as Greybeard's web-based tool. https://exiftool.org/ is open-source, and runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux.

So I started out the night with no clue how to find shutter count, and ended the night with the tough choice of which excellent tool to use to find it. 

Thanks again guys. 😀

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, itchy shutter finger said:

After spending a couple hours researching exif protocol, I discovered most of us already have a tool right at our fingertips that displays information nearly as nice as Greybeard's web-based tool. https://exiftool.org/ is open-source, and runs on Windows, Mac, and Linux.

I’m a big fan of Exiftool and have used it extensively. It has one (smallish) problem with Shutter Count (or Image Count as Exiftool calls it) - it only uses part of the field and will roll over when it gets to 32K - whereas the actual field used by FujiFilm is capable of holding 64K (and then rolls over back to the start)

Edited by Greybeard
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Greybeard said:

I’m a big fan of Exiftool and have used it extensively. It has one (smallish) problem with Shutter Count (or Image Count as Exiftool calls it) - it only uses part of the field and will roll over when it gets to 32K - whereas the actual field used by FujiFilm is capable of holding 64K (and then rolls over back to the start)

Yes, I was just looking further at your web app, and saw you use Exiftool as its engine. Clearly your web app is the best tool, IMHO, because of the structure in which you display the information. Thank you for making it available to us. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is one thing I have never gotten clear in my mind about Fujifilm using the term Image Count. I am not sure if that includes images gotten with only the mechanical shutter or if it includes ones obtained with the electronic shutter. I suppose it is easy to fire off several shots with only the ms engaged, several with only es engaged, and then some more with ms + es engaged and check the counts to see. Maybe some day down the road when I get really curious. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jerryy said:

There is one thing I have never gotten clear in my mind about Fujifilm using the term Image Count. I am not sure if that includes images gotten with only the mechanical shutter or if it includes ones obtained with the electronic shutter. I suppose it is easy to fire off several shots with only the ms engaged, several with only es engaged, and then some more with ms + es engaged and check the counts to see. Maybe some day down the road when I get really curious. 

When researching this last night, I came across multiple references that said the image count includes both mechanical and electronic shutter actuation, and this was a Fujifilm idiosyncrasy. I recall none saying it was mechanical only.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jerryy said:

There is one thing I have never gotten clear in my mind about Fujifilm using the term Image Count. I am not sure if that includes images gotten with only the mechanical shutter or if it includes ones obtained with the electronic shutter. I suppose it is easy to fire off several shots with only the ms engaged, several with only es engaged, and then some more with ms + es engaged and check the counts to see. Maybe some day down the road when I get really curious. 

Yes it includes both MS and ES - and to make it worse - on recent cameras it includes images taken with pre-shot that might not even get written to the card - its not a good guide as to the life of the mechanical shutter.

FujiFilm doesn't call it Image Count - they don't call it anything at all as they don't document their EXIF fields - the Exiftool developer - Phil Harvey - came up with that name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi, I just tried your app with a RAF file to know the number of actuations done by a GFX 50R. If I look in the metadata tab it says

Shutter Count 1797


But if I right click to get the EXIF tab and look at #1438 tag I find : 34565 (Image Count)
Which one is the good one ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
14 hours ago, Jason Wallis said:

That does work for my XT3 but unfortunately the shutter count doesn't appear for the XT100?

The Shutter Count tag used by the online viewers doesn't exist in files from the X-T100 and X-T200 - I don't know of any way of getting shutter count from those cameras.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...