Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've just been playing around with raw files of the Fuji X-S10, using Hex Fiend on macOS. If you replace the instances of X-S10 with X-T30, then Capture One will open those files.

You could also replace X-S10 with X-T3 but then you have fiddle a bit because that's one character less and the following bytes will move one position forward.

Warning #1: only do this if you know what you're doing. Make a backup of your raw files first before you start editing them!!

Warning #2: I don't know if the result in Capture One is the same as proper support in C1 v21.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 12/18/2020 at 1:35 AM, Spencer said:

I've just been playing around with raw files of the Fuji X-S10, using Hex Fiend on macOS. If you replace the instances of X-S10 with X-T30, then Capture One will open those files.

You could also replace X-S10 with X-T3 but then you have fiddle a bit because that's one character less and the following bytes will move one position forward.

Warning #1: only do this if you know what you're doing. Make a backup of your raw files first before you start editing them!!

Warning #2: I don't know if the result in Capture One is the same as proper support in C1 v21.

thanks for the information .keep posting whenever you find any information like this , it will be helpful for others .have a nice day ahead

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/17/2020 at 3:05 PM, Spencer said:

I've just been playing around with raw files of the Fuji X-S10, using Hex Fiend on macOS. If you replace the instances of X-S10 with X-T30, then Capture One will open those files.

You could also replace X-S10 with X-T3 but then you have fiddle a bit because that's one character less and the following bytes will move one position forward.

Warning #1: only do this if you know what you're doing. Make a backup of your raw files first before you start editing them!!

Warning #2: I don't know if the result in Capture One is the same as proper support in C1 v21.

You can also do this using exif editors without having to worry about that extra byte in the body name. But hex editors are more fun!

(In general, is you do this make. sure the sensor and bsi type etc. etc. are the same so that the image editor can bring out the most in the file. You might want to change the information after you have imported it.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jerryy said:

You can also do this using exif editors without having to worry about that extra byte in the body name. But hex editors are more fun!

(In general, is you do this make. sure the sensor and bsi type etc. etc. are the same so that the image editor can bring out the most in the file. You might want to change the information after you have imported it.)

Sometimes I substitute X-E2 with  X-T4 and see nothing wrong about image rendering )))

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...