Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm trying to work out which camera settings are applied to the RAW files on the X-T1.

 

I shoot 'RAW only' with a load of settings applied, including ones on the Q menu e.g. film simulation Chrome, sharpness +1, dynamic range 100 etc.

 

Are these settings actually applied to the RAW file when it is downloaded to my laptop? I work with Capture One Pro 8 on a Macbook Pro. Reading through a ton of web pages and people's opinion about only shooting jpg I'm suddenly unsure if any of the settings I tweak on the camera are actually applied to the file when I download it and am starting to get the impression these settings are only applied to jpg files.

 

Matt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I can tell, none of the settings are affecting the raw files, which would be normal behind the ideology of shooting in raw formats.

 

But they are indeed taken into consideration when shooting jpegs. The only setting I am unsure is the DR, it doesn't look like it is being applied to raw files but I am rather uncertain as I did not really set up any tests for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RAW data is only affected by exposure, so only settings that affect the exposure will affect the contents of the RAW file. Things like aperture, shutter speed, exp. comp, ISO and DR come to mind.

I think the author meant what settings does the raw converter detect and apply to RAW automatically during import. For example when I shoot RAW+JPEG 1:1 Lightroom imports RAW only files as 1:1. Nevertheless I can still reset the crop to original 3:2 image.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the author meant what settings does the raw converter detect and apply to RAW automatically during import. For example when I shoot RAW+JPEG 1:1 Lightroom imports RAW only files as 1:1. Nevertheless I can still reset the crop to original 3:2 image.

 

That depends on the RAW converter that is used. There are more than a dozen converters out there that support X-Trans to some extent, so somebody could make a list that should at least include lens metadata corrections, DR settings and Fuji film simulations. I already did that work to some extent with several popular converters (LR, Iridient, Aperture, Silkypix, PhotoNinja, Capture One) in my book, but there's always more, so feel free to add to the list.

 

Almost all metadata settings and maker notes are stored in the RAW file, as well, but there are a few exceptions. To see the differences, all one has to do is open a RAW and a corresponding SOOC JPEG in ExifTool and compare the EXIF contents. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

RAW data is only affected by exposure, so only settings that affect the exposure will affect the contents of the RAW file. Things like aperture, shutter speed, exp. comp, ISO and DR come to mind.

This makes sense...

 

I think the author meant what settings does the raw converter detect and apply to RAW automatically during import. For example when I shoot RAW+JPEG 1:1 Lightroom imports RAW only files as 1:1. Nevertheless I can still reset the crop to original 3:2 image.

But yes, Dis, I am assuming Capture One Pro will apply the above. Obviously things like aperture affect the light falling on the sensor so there is no 'setting' to record but how about DR? Also you have my thoughts spot on, if I set the sharpness to +1 would Capture One RAW convertor apply this when converting or is this not recorded at all in camera when shooting RAW only?

Link to post
Share on other sites

But yes, Dis, I am assuming Capture One Pro will apply the above. Obviously things like aperture affect the light falling on the sensor so there is no 'setting' to record but how about DR? Also you have my thoughts spot on, if I set the sharpness to +1 would Capture One RAW convertor apply this when converting or is this not recorded at all in camera when shooting RAW only?

Sadly I can't help you with this. You have to wait for smb who does use Capture One.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I wish lightroom would try to mimic the in-camera settings at the time of shooting raw (like film simulation, shadows etc). It gives you a closer starting point with your images rather than them being fully reset by lightroom.

 

There are already fuji simulation camera profiles, even if it just auto loaded that for the images. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best use the built-in Fuji RAW converter for this.

 

One major purpose of Lightroom is to equalize the RAWs from countless different camera models from different brands with different sensors from the past 10-15 years to a common denominator, so settings and presets (selfmade and commercial) work with all of them. Lightroom is the big equalizer.

 

Lightroom will never be able to perfectly emulate the Fujifilm look, especially not the smooth highlights from Fuji's DR function. It's lacking the features to do so. Iridient will lead to better results. So will AfterShot Pro, btw (which I recently tested out of curiosity, but that software has other issues).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about Capture One but LR 6 does allow some film type processeses.

 

If I remember correctly, in the Develop module go to Calibration and under the Adobe CR version there is another dropdown (can't remember what it's called) which allows you to select various processeses that mirror the Fuji 'film types' ie Velvia. Apply these to an image and then save these as a preset, which you can then use on import if you wish.

 

Hope that makes sense and is helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RAW is RAW, that tells it, no ?

What affects the RAW are you settings during exposure (ISO, shutter speed, aperture, exposure compensation) that's it.

 

Things you fix with the Q menu, shadows, highlights, film simulation, etc. are only applied on JPEG if you shoot it or if you shoot RAW+Fine for example.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...