Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not a big fan of hoods but do appreciate that they can in some cases help protect the lens. But I'm not going to use those humongous petal hoods Fuji sends out so any suggestions for metal lens hoods for:

XF 23 mm (rectangular like the one for the 35mm lens would be great!...if there is such a thing)

XF 16-55 mm (would have to be quite short given how wide it starts..probably no more than 2 cm hood length?)

Suggestions for other lenses welcome too...others may need them!!

 

UPDATE 29/6/15:  

 

Ordered these standard metal hoods from gadgetworldexports - 62 mm, 77 mm.  

 

Nice thing is that they're compatible with these caps..need to get the 67 mm cap for the 62 mm hood and 82 for the 77.  Next update when I've got and tried them!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

yes tnx. I knew that. But I don't want to screw it in the lens. 

Any particular reason why not? I have been using screw in lens hood's for the past 40 odd years never had a problem.

 

As the thread on the lens is there for filters, screw in lens hoods should not present a problem

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have a question related to these (non-fuji) METAL lens hoods

 

These appear to screw into the lens using the filter thread.  Assuming there is less flex in the metal, if (when) the lens hood take a knock Is there a risk of either the filter thread being damaged or the internal alignment of the lens mechanism being affected?

 

Does anyone have any first hand experience?  

 

TX 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it can happen, but if you take a knock of the front part of the lens, even if without filter or lens hood you will damage it. It might affect the autofocus in some lensed (not if the autofocus is internal).

 

The 60mm, for example, was provided with that huge lens hood to not interfere with this filter mount. If you put a hood there without a filter to act as a spacer, the lens will find it impossible to focus and give you an alarm on the screen.

 

If you ever damage the part which has the filter thread is generally a part of the lens though which can easily be screwed off and replaced at relative low cost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For those who love knocking, there are filter-mountable rubber lens hoods, branded and nonames, straight and collapsible, even allowing to add filter in front of.

 

41AcBD7TtXL.jpg

multihood3450.jpg

 

I used such rubber lens hoods long ago ... worked very well, but eventually the rubber hood would crack.

 

But I think it saved the front element of my Zeiss Sonnar 135mm back then!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...