Jump to content

minor firmware upgrades for 18-55 and 10-24

BobJ

By BobJ
in Fuji X Lenses

 Share

Recommended Posts

BobJ Community Regular

BobJ

Posted
Posted

Just to say that firmware upgrades were posted by Fuji on October 5th. Don't know what "shaking in peripheral part of images" means though. I can't say I ever noticed it. I have applied the upgrades and the upgrade for the X-T2 and it all went OK.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Felnus Apprentice

Felnus

Posted
Posted

I have to say, I know exactly what the "shaking" was. I got the 18-55 mm as part of the kit with my X-T10 but it very quickly became my least used lens as I built my collection. In a lot of images, it looked like there was motion blur or an out of focus area near the corners of the image that wasn't in motion or shouldn't have been out of focus given the aperture setting. I also had an occasional issue where I would get a lens control error when using the OIS. I did the upgrade and took the lens out with my X-E1 yesterday and to shoot some fall foliage and I feel like I've gotten a brand new lens. Neither issue reared its head all day.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Vidalgo Community Regular

Vidalgo

Posted
Posted

Yes, it looks to be exactly a problem that I get sometimes with both my 18-55 and 10-24.
A little blurred areas close to corners or edges. Central area of image is always OK.
It's happened only sometimes and visible only at full resolution.
My shooting manner is to take 2-3 shoots of the same scene in purpose to avoid possible camera shake or autofocus miss and then to pick the best copy. So that local "shaking" is not so critical. But annoying of course.
I was shured the problem is related to the OIS. Not the major malfunction of operation, lets to say, non-ideality at some cases.
I did these new firmware updates of both lenses, but still don't have an opportunity to check it thoroughly. Hope it will be the solution.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nero Rising Star

Nero

Posted
Posted

I'm looking forward to updating and testing my 10-24mm. This was my big complaint about it and causes me to keep the OIS turned off except when I'm shooting dark, interior architecture, such as old cathedrals. I still like the lens and I'll probably still keep it turned off unless absolutely needed, but if they've made progress in fixing this issue it will be most welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • thelostkiwi
      Looking for Full Frame lenses to adapt to GFX

      By thelostkiwi · Posted

      I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Trevor R
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By Trevor R · Posted

      Thank you. I will research it.
    • jerryy
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By jerryy · Posted

      Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Trevor R
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By Trevor R · Posted

      Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • jerryy
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By jerryy · Posted

      Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...