Jump to content

Fuji X-PRO 2 will come only in to 2016 (trusted source) – waiting for the Sony A7000 sensor?


Recommended Posts

if there is anything revolutionary in the X Pro to come ( why 2 could be a 10?) it will be only logical that they wait for the impact of the X-T series has settled before they come with something which makes that series look obsolete.

 

Whatever will come will come later rather than sooner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great! I personally hope they steer clear of X-Trans on it, causes more problems than it ever solved IMO. Just a great, new, BSI or whatever sensor which has great dynamic range, low noise, good detail, to really let those X-lenses shine and avoid post-processing problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The X-Pro stable has never been about speed. It's more about picture IQ and a shooting experience. It'll probably never rival the X-T range.

 

Not all photographers are chasing fast moving objects. It's about slowing the pace a little to take that nice picture during a nice walk....somewhere.

 

With that, I am expecting stupendous picture quality from the X-Pro2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ektachrome

 

The whole processing problems thing is getting tired. There are only problems with LR and they are very slowly getting fixed.

 

The alternative is you can go with any of the myriad alternatives as a post processing tool.

 

I just don't get the attitude, the X-Trans in my opinion when processed well gives fantastic results. I am only interested in the quality of the end product, if I have to change my processing tool then so be it.

 

Where do you draw the line. Oh I want better picture quality but buying a new lens is too much effort, actually buying a camera is too much effort, hang on taking pictures is too much effort.

 

I really don't want to see progress and development of interesting new technologies to be limited by lazy people thank you, otherwize I would be writing this in ink and posting it.

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

I watch the Sony Alpha 7 for a while. Many variants. Fast and active development. Full format. Great lenses. Maybe I should try one to shorten waiting time?   :rolleyes:

 

I have tested the a7 extensively. Speaking of the original a7 and a7ii, no serious advantage concerning potential image quality, even while using the same lenses. In fact I've made a comparison using the same legacy manual lenses, with the Fuji utilizing a focal reducer.

 

The a7ii has IBIS, which is a considerable advantage. OTOH, if you consider available Fuji lenses vs available (native) Sony ones, the end result, IMHO, favors Fuji. Not to mention that cost is higher for a similar a7 system. Personally I also find the look of the Fuji output much more pleasant and "organic" looking.

 

The a7R and, of course, a7Rii are another matter. If you need high pixel count the a7R is a good bet, albeit with serious quirks, such as shutter shock. The a7Rii seems to be a superb, albeit expensive, imaging tool, which I myself will seriously consider when lens line-up is a tad more mature.

 

I'm not trying to belittle Sonys and I'm far from a fanboy (in fact, I use them too, as well as Olympus and Panasonic cameras). For the time being, it is a somewhat limited system, very good for adapted lenses and for those that are ok with the current lens ecosystem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...