Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It will be incredible to see one of those server farms in person, you lucky guy

 

But as I said, 4.5 TB of data are nothing, internet is huge, very huge

 

It sounded strange to me too, but megnetic tapes are a really good metod to store "cold data", data that are accessed only once in a time and

don't need high access speeds. And however nowadays a magnetic tape as big as a briefcase can hold more than 150 TB of data, and as CDs they are cheap,

really cheap compared to an hard disk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

to answer the OP's question, I have very little experience with film. I bought a Pentax 35mm point and shoot at 8 years old and used that until I bought my first digital camera in my teens. My uncle gave me an old Pentax SLR that I played with for a while, maybe 12 rolls of film or so. Everything else has been digital. I really liked the 5D Classic.

 

As far as fujifilm cameras, it's really about the camera. I've always loved the look and feel of the old Pentax SLR I was given as well as classic rangefinders I've seen. I really liked the looks of the X100 and the X-Pro1, but didn't buy one. After the X-E1 came out and the price dropped, I ordered it. Partially because it reminded me of a Leica and partially because of the X-Tran sensor. It was somewhat of a love and hate relationship. The EVF lag and sluggish AF annoyed me. I loved everything else about it. I ordered the X-T1 and fell completely in love with it. I've since traded the X-E1 for the X-E2 and bought the X100T and both are excellent. I will probably sell the X-E2 and buy the X-Pro2 when it comes out. I think that will be the perfect combination of features. I love having the OVF and EVF in the X100T. Of course image quality matters too and the fujifilm cameras deliver there as good or better than anyone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be incredible to see one of those server farms in person, you lucky guy

 

[...]

 

Actually, once the hype wears off, it's just a large open space with tons of PC that's being kept cold that generate a rather loud buzzing sound.

It's not really the physical aspect of it, but really the idea that truck load of data are transiting every single second into that place, most likely more information for any human to be able to learn in a life time.

 

But back on the subject. I got a Fuji mostly because it's small, the IQ is great even on a 3 years old sensor, kinda make me wish my old and aging D5000 could produce anything remotely half good as this, plus I could have full physical controls that I wanted.

Some limitations that I wasn't aware did threw me off, mostly the native ISO being capped at 6400 and same goes for the RAF files not going any higher than that.

 

I was considering the X-T1 against the OM-D EM-5 with the 5 stops in body stabilization and super small lenses but the sensor size was not really much of an improvement with my Nikon 1 being my regular get go camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...