Jump to content

Recommended Posts

When I moved to Fuji, I decided to sell my Lee 100mm filters and get a few 77mm circular B+W MRC ND filters, in order to have a lighter kit, and I'm pretty happy so far. I have the 3 and 10 stops, and I plan to get the 6 stops someday. My copy of 10 stops does require to fix the white balance.

 

I now always carry at least one ND filter with me; which was not the case with Lee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try Nisi or Haida. The color cast is either minimal or easier to control. I use both. Haida is more affordable.

 

I've tried SinghRay, LEE, Cokin, Athabasca, Marumi, Kenko and some which I can't recall. I find that both Nisi and Haida are my go to filters nowadays....

Edited by Aswald
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 6 months later...

I use Nisi filter system  but before I bought anything I read a lot of reviews,  and bought a lot of the cheaper filters circular ones

 

and some of the cheaper ones are just as good as the Lee/Nisi, and many more makes,

 

you read a review and someone recommends a certain filter the next review you read someone critics that filter

 

believe me the  more expensive filters,

you are paying  for the name that's all.

Lee have bad colour cast but the say they have no colour cast all

the filter makers claim the same, you can fix in LR/PP 

 

you have to make the decision,

 

why did I go for Nisi it was just advertised with more spin/  but so far it has served me well  yes there is a little colour cast but as far as I'm concerned,

 

there are NONE  that are perfect  just my opinion  and rant :o  :lol:  :(  :blink:

(I have nothing to do with Nisi )

 

Tom G  Scotland

Link to post
Share on other sites

For reference, circular polarizer is a bit more than an ND2 filter but less than ND3. Spectral transmission will be slightly different than a ND filter.

 

ND filters may be neutral, yet have varying spectral power reduction/attenuation. Look for the power versus wavelength curves in the filter specification. That said, color reproduction can be fixed in post processing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Highly recommend formatt hitech firecast range. I spent some time looking at reviews and they were consistently at/near the top. Very little color cast. And also pleased with my circular b+w nd filter (nano mrc version). With formatt hitech holder on xf10-24mm no vignette with one nd on @10mm, a little with two

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...