Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Let's try an group the reviews for the new camera here...

 

As an X-photographer, I shot an X-100F for a few weeks and my review can be found here:

http://bjornmoerman.blogspot.dk/2017/01/first-look-fujifilm-x-100f-review.html

 

Always happy to answer questions here or on my blog.

Regards,

BJORN

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice review. I'm considering replacing my X100T with the X100F. I haven't been using my X100T much recently for two reasons. The first is the AF feels very outdated compared to the new models. No real multi-point AF. The second is that it uses a different battery and I hate carrying multiple battery types and chargers. I'm also liking the X-T20, but I think I may already have too many cameras, haha. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The lack of weather resistance and the same 6 year old lens, will make me skip this generation of the x100 series. I keep my x100t a little longer for the next generation or possibly an upcoming xe3.

Out of curiosity, is there something with the current lens you dislike? I've heard some people complain about it and others say it is great. I haven't compared it agains my 23mm F/1.4 or F/2 lenses. My X100T has been more of a fun camera than one I've taken out on a serious shoot so I never really looked into the lens quality that much.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think most of current X100 series user expected the X100F to be a WR camera especially with that price tag even thought some of the new feature in X100F are very interesting and welcomed. Since majority of X100 user use this camera as documentary/street/carry all the time kind of camera, WR is important to keep user ease that their camera will not spoil by little rainy or moisture environment. About the 6 year old len in X100 serious...i just read some review say that because it cannot be seal/WR so the X100F make as none WR...I don't know that the correct decision or not but for sure will raise some argument that why not redesign a new one??? Anyhow our of us might got different perspective of new X100 and fujifilm cannot satisfied all of us. X100T of mine still very fun to use and I will keep it until another new X100 that can change my mine :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Let's try an group the reviews for the new camera here...

 

As an X-photographer, I shot an X-100F for a few weeks and my review can be found here:

http://bjornmoerman.blogspot.dk/2017/01/first-look-fujifilm-x-100f-review.html

 

Always happy to answer questions here or on my blog.

Regards,

BJORN

 

 

Thank you for the review. I'm switching from a X100s to the f and I'm pretty keen how all those little tweaks and additions will feel. For my X100s I owned a LC-X100s leather case. Will the case also fit on the X100f? Any clue? Asking because I saw a case like the LC-X100s on one of your pictures...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

For my X100s I owned a LC-X100s leather case. Will the case also fit on the X100f? Any clue? Asking because I saw a case like the LC-X100s on one of your pictures...

 

Sorry. The X100F is a little bit thicker than the previous models. Therefore the new case LC-X100F. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • Hy there When Im using the fan001 on the XH2s and I flip the LCD Screen vertically by 180 degrees then the image flips vertically, what is good but it also flips horizontally. The clean feed on HDMI is not flipping horizontally but its also flipping if the HDMI output info display is on. When I unmount the fan then the image flips only vertically. My firmware is updated to the latest version. Any ideas if there is a fix for that?
    • In reply to the original question, it all depends on what you mean by infrared.  If you mean "see thermal information", then I agree with the comments here.  However, if you mean near-infrared, the X-T4, or basically any digital camera can be modified to "see" it.  Check out Lifepixel.com and Kolarivision.com for more info. As regards lenses, I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • No - I don’t think so - it means you can take pictures if you remove the lens completely - but I’m not sure that is a problem
    • I bought a manual lens over xmas and it took me a while to find the "shutter w/o lens" function in the menu settings.  So far I haven't found a way to either put that on the Q menu or marry that setting to one of the 4 custom modes.   Am I missing something? Is there a problem if I just leave that setting enabled even when the OEM auto lens is in place? tia
×
×
  • Create New...