OleDK

OK, you win. I give in. Sorry for the inconvenience.

In all the threads where I called the camera unusable, that conclusion is pure logic if you accept the OPs statements. You may call it sarcastic because I do not necessarily accept the statements. But IF I did, I would have to sell my cameras. I will quote my original post: "People rant about alleged design errors. People rant about design choices." If people just stated "I am very sorry/angry/whatever about this design choice". But they usually state "Fujifilm are idiots because of this. An I am actually both sorry and angry about that.

You want examples? Okay: "Why Fuji, why?" "But somehow Fuji managed to throw me for a loop." "Arrgrrggghhhhhhhh!!!! WTF!!!!" "cripple the camera since it's too much effort to change the lens cap design. Brilliant!" "Which kind of makes the thing useless for anyone with an attention span longer than 3 minutes." "Just imagining the kind of narrow focus required to design something so daft is painful." "I wish they would just hand their prototypes to photographers for testing/feedback before signing off on them..."

So you think calling out the trollers is trolling? I am about to throw in the towel for good in this forum.

Where is the OP Enrico in this discussion? Enrico we need to see examples, otherwise we can't help. And we need to know exactly what you did in raw processing.

Mine does not have that sound. Off to repairs!

BTW, I do agree with the OP that that new "feature" is annoying. I just don't like the trolling language.

Honestly, I don't find the Q-button placement wrong - perhaps it's the size of my hands.

DNFTT

Yes and perhaps we need to call out the whiners and the trolls.

Bugger. The camera is unusable. I will sell mine!

Bugger. The camera is unusable. I will sell mine!

Bugger. The camera is unusable. I will sell mine!

I have been to these forums before, but I have been away for quite some time now. Not because I don't have Fuji cameras and not because I don't appreciate the amount of knowledge gathered here. But because I was tired of the tone in discussions and of the rants. I am back now. But it seems as if everything is unchanged. People rant about alleged design errors. People rant about design choices. People rant about things that turn out to be misunderstandings on their part. People rant about things that are ignorance about or misunderstandings of fundamental photographic technique. People rant about production errors in their cameras. People rant about production errors in other peoples' cameras, despite not having bought their own camera yet. People rant about production backlog and delivery times. What kind of forum do you people really want? Please, everyone, stop ranting.

I would like to be able to have only 5 auto focus points: One in the center and one at each of the four golden ratio or rule of thirds points.

Bugger. The camera is unusable!!! I will sell mine.

I guess that the pictures should have been posted in this thread: http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/4576-watercolour/

A very fine report on your thoughts - and very much in line with my own, although I never had the original x100 but bought the x100s as my first Fujifilm camera.

nvp repeating yourself does not make you right. Of course Fujifilm have formal testing and of course there will still be errors. Anyone who have ever worked in software development knows that it is virtually impossible to have error free programs. And they also knows that you can't *test* quality into software. Try talking to software developers in avionics, space industry, medical devices or other life critical applications. That being said, I think there are actually very few software errors in the Fuji cameras. And Fuji also gives us the benefit of firmware updates that not only corrects any errors but also new features. And the "problem" we are discussing here is probably not even perceived to be an error at all, merely a design choice of how certain things should work. That you don't agree to that design choice does not make it an error.

I wrote earlier that my X100F did not do that. However, I was wrong. I does "step" the aperture, but not always. I have not yet figured out under which circumstances it behaves like this.

My x100f does not behave that way.