Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just a heads up if anyone is buying a new XF 90mm lens through B&H. I've received two bad lenses. Best description I can give it is that the interior of the lens is physically loose.

 

B&H is sending a third tomorrow. No complaints with B&H's handling, but there may be a bad batch of these lenses out there.

 

~Z

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a heads up if anyone is buying a new XF 90mm lens through B&H. I've received two bad lenses. Best description I can give it is that the interior of the lens is physically loose.

 

B&H is sending a third tomorrow. No complaints with B&H's handling, but there may be a bad batch of these lenses out there.

 

~Z

 

Isn't that just because of the stabilisation or is it really broken? 

Edited by Sluw
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thanks for the links to the previous discussion. None of the several people I spoke with at B&H had never heard of the problem, one of whom was a sales person who is shooting X-gear. If any of you know Gabe Biderman (@B&H) I borrowed his 90 a couple of weeks ago and his lens didn't do this.

 

In 50+ years of buying lenses I've never heard this in a lens. I can't imagine that this can be good over the long haul even if this is what the designers intended.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s very well possible that the lens were “ normal”.

 

There is no shame in not knowing this for anyone and it is not something that you will encounter very often but the lens seems to rattle inside when not engaged on a switched on camera and that is a normal feature for this lens.

 

There are several people on line who have spoken about this, they have all observed a “ clunk” while the lens is not on the camera and turned on 

 

Good luck with your next copy but chances are that it will clunk like all others

 

http://findingrange.com/2015/09/01/fuji-xf-90mm-f2-lm-wr-lens-review/

 

https://olafphotoblog.com/2015/07/09/fujinon-xf-90mm-f2-first-take-and-taken-aback/

 

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3878356

 

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/57242380

 

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1375529/6

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, OP hasn’t said whether he or she took any pictures but it appears that upon hearing the “ clunk” he or she got the idea that this would necessarily mean that the re was something wrong with two lenses in a row and chances are that the third won’t be any different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good frickin lord...

 

The focus group of the 90mm is controlled by a magnetic linear motor. Without power, the focus group is, within the defined space for it, a little loose. This has been reported a few dozen times in each and every damn Fuji forum. You either never heard of the search function in a forum or just don't inform yourself about a new piece of gear beforehand.

 

I'm feeling sorry for B&H. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 No need to be harsh, not everyone lives on fora or checks on internet all kind of things and nobody knows everything. We all learn by making mistakes.

 

 Yes, maybe it would have been a good idea to check this out beforehand, but now this should be cleared to OP who had very good intentions with his warning post.

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a heads up if anyone is buying a new XF 90mm lens through B&H. I've received two bad lenses. Best description I can give it is that the interior of the lens is physically loose.

 

B&H is sending a third tomorrow. No complaints with B&H's handling, but there may be a bad batch of these lenses out there.

 

~Z

 

No, that clunk is perfectly normal. Mine does it and it is a totally superb lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your definition of a "fine" lens and mine may differ.

Hmm. My experience of the people on this forum is that they know their stuff. And they also tend to take the trouble to check up on the products they use without jumping to conclusions about whether they are or are not broken. Didn't you even think of googling this when the second lens had the same behaviour as the first?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody knows everything.

 

And the best thing a forum can do is spreading experience.

 

Some slack needs being cut. Play nice to each other.

 

 

 

Thank you, milandro.

 

I heard back from Gabe at B&H last night. Here is his email to me. [emphasis mine]

 

"I actually never noticed it until you sent me the email and I just tested mine and it actually does the same thing.  I asked my friend at Fuji the details and he replied:

The movement is the lens quad linear motor focusing mechanism when not engaged. We need more education on that

They are disengaged when power off. So they rock a bit then when AF [is] on they roll!! Fast n quiet AF.

 
Hope that helps and enjoy the new lens!
 
Gabe"
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

For having customers that send back equipment being perfectly fine.

 

The XF90-rattles-when-being-shaken-"issue" has approximately 10-20 threads in this forum alone and is the #1 issue-that-isn't-an-issue reported about the 90.

 

I could understand when someone asks about it when the unit arrives and the user is unsure about it. But instantly sending back 2 units without researching?

Edited by Marc G.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...