Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just a heads up if anyone is buying a new XF 90mm lens through B&H. I've received two bad lenses. Best description I can give it is that the interior of the lens is physically loose.

 

B&H is sending a third tomorrow. No complaints with B&H's handling, but there may be a bad batch of these lenses out there.

 

~Z

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a heads up if anyone is buying a new XF 90mm lens through B&H. I've received two bad lenses. Best description I can give it is that the interior of the lens is physically loose.

 

B&H is sending a third tomorrow. No complaints with B&H's handling, but there may be a bad batch of these lenses out there.

 

~Z

 

Isn't that just because of the stabilisation or is it really broken? 

Edited by Sluw
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thanks for the links to the previous discussion. None of the several people I spoke with at B&H had never heard of the problem, one of whom was a sales person who is shooting X-gear. If any of you know Gabe Biderman (@B&H) I borrowed his 90 a couple of weeks ago and his lens didn't do this.

 

In 50+ years of buying lenses I've never heard this in a lens. I can't imagine that this can be good over the long haul even if this is what the designers intended.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s very well possible that the lens were “ normal”.

 

There is no shame in not knowing this for anyone and it is not something that you will encounter very often but the lens seems to rattle inside when not engaged on a switched on camera and that is a normal feature for this lens.

 

There are several people on line who have spoken about this, they have all observed a “ clunk” while the lens is not on the camera and turned on 

 

Good luck with your next copy but chances are that it will clunk like all others

 

http://findingrange.com/2015/09/01/fuji-xf-90mm-f2-lm-wr-lens-review/

 

https://olafphotoblog.com/2015/07/09/fujinon-xf-90mm-f2-first-take-and-taken-aback/

 

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3878356

 

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/57242380

 

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1375529/6

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, OP hasn’t said whether he or she took any pictures but it appears that upon hearing the “ clunk” he or she got the idea that this would necessarily mean that the re was something wrong with two lenses in a row and chances are that the third won’t be any different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good frickin lord...

 

The focus group of the 90mm is controlled by a magnetic linear motor. Without power, the focus group is, within the defined space for it, a little loose. This has been reported a few dozen times in each and every damn Fuji forum. You either never heard of the search function in a forum or just don't inform yourself about a new piece of gear beforehand.

 

I'm feeling sorry for B&H. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 No need to be harsh, not everyone lives on fora or checks on internet all kind of things and nobody knows everything. We all learn by making mistakes.

 

 Yes, maybe it would have been a good idea to check this out beforehand, but now this should be cleared to OP who had very good intentions with his warning post.

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a heads up if anyone is buying a new XF 90mm lens through B&H. I've received two bad lenses. Best description I can give it is that the interior of the lens is physically loose.

 

B&H is sending a third tomorrow. No complaints with B&H's handling, but there may be a bad batch of these lenses out there.

 

~Z

 

No, that clunk is perfectly normal. Mine does it and it is a totally superb lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your definition of a "fine" lens and mine may differ.

Hmm. My experience of the people on this forum is that they know their stuff. And they also tend to take the trouble to check up on the products they use without jumping to conclusions about whether they are or are not broken. Didn't you even think of googling this when the second lens had the same behaviour as the first?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody knows everything.

 

And the best thing a forum can do is spreading experience.

 

Some slack needs being cut. Play nice to each other.

 

 

 

Thank you, milandro.

 

I heard back from Gabe at B&H last night. Here is his email to me. [emphasis mine]

 

"I actually never noticed it until you sent me the email and I just tested mine and it actually does the same thing.  I asked my friend at Fuji the details and he replied:

The movement is the lens quad linear motor focusing mechanism when not engaged. We need more education on that

They are disengaged when power off. So they rock a bit then when AF [is] on they roll!! Fast n quiet AF.

 
Hope that helps and enjoy the new lens!
 
Gabe"
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

For having customers that send back equipment being perfectly fine.

 

The XF90-rattles-when-being-shaken-"issue" has approximately 10-20 threads in this forum alone and is the #1 issue-that-isn't-an-issue reported about the 90.

 

I could understand when someone asks about it when the unit arrives and the user is unsure about it. But instantly sending back 2 units without researching?

Edited by Marc G.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I really like the image quality, size, and weight of my mark II. I never owned the mark I so I can’t help with comparison though it is highly regarded as a great lens.  I don’t use mine for video but I will say it doesn’t have the smoothest zoom, which seems to be common complaint for the mark II.  For photos it doesn’t bother me but I would imagine would be an issue if zooming while recording video. 
    • Good day fellow Fuji people   I wanted to ask your opinion on the subject of the 16-55mm Mark I vs Mark II. I want to use it mainly for my concert photography where I currently use my 50-140mm and a second camera with a prime lense. I would like to use a second good quality zoom lens thats why I became interested in the 16-55mm. My question is for anyone having experience with both wether the new one (which looks very promising but pricey) or the older one (much heavier but seems to deliver on optical quality and I could get that used for roughly half the price of the new one)?  From what I could find online I guess in terms of pure image quality both are going to deliver. So then it would come down to usability, ease of use, maybe video ability, and longevity etc.  I use my Fuji X-H2 and Fuji X-S20 currently. If anyone has thoughts I would be highly appreciative. Thank you in advance,   Best regards from Switzerland, Mischa 
    • It'd be a bit of a rigmarole, but maybe enable the function buttons on the lens, focus on infinity (distant tower/tree/mountain/etc), then set that as a focus preset. Use a function button to return to that infinity focus when you have a bird against a clear sky. I have the same problem with my XF 150-600, so far I just put up with it, or zoom out enough to find and focus on the bird, or focus on a distant treetop etc.
    • I've wondered the same thing. Years ago I learned that some very long lenses can focus slightly past infinity, for the reasons that temperature and other variables can move the mechanical location of infinity focus around a little bit, and IIRC using IR film can require focusing out further than the position that's best for visible light. I've focused on birds on distant towers, and the autofocus worked for that. Still, I'll be watching this thread for further developments.
    • I was hoping to get some info on how to infinity focus the xf 500mm.  I’m trying to focus on distant birds in the sky.  Is there an infinity mark on the lenses? If so, I can’t find it. If there’s not one, how would one work around this?
×
×
  • Create New...