Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Many moons ago I was a Leica user 

M6 and M7 and a lot of very expensive glass

 

Recently Ive been thinking about a digital Leica .....

 

Today I went to the dealer and tried the M 240 

 

I hated it !

 

It did nothing for me at all 

 

I also had a look at the Q whilst there

 

The viewfinder screen is appalling !!

 

The XT1 is so superior its not funny !

 

So I am now very happy as Ive saved about 12k by not getting involved in what is increasingly becoming a rich mans toy

 

Leica I don't know what you are playing at but in my opinion you've lost the plot !

 

Fuji really are producing the goods and with the imminent arrival of the XP2 Leica must be very concerned 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Ridgeback

:lol:

 

Too much fashion designered bling for their fave customers from the big sandbox, the states of the middle and Putin's underworld.

 

Similar reasons why I stopped using their products. That's not to say I'd not pick up some vintage Leica glass if offered at a good price.

Edited by Ridgeback
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Ridgeback

THIS is what you need! :D

 

Like a second anus. Not even if money was no object.

 

I'd spend the money on one of these instead:

Edited by Ridgeback
Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica has always been regarded as some kind of good/great company, but lately they seems to have lost their touch, nothing they released after the M9 is worth much excitement, the Q is an okay camera, the M240 is just plain.

They are still very nice to you for those that can appreciate rangefinders and the lens are still silky smooth to focus with, but really nothing major, nor impressive was released Leica for a good while now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're going to love the M9!

I've been a Leica user since 1976 having started off with an M3 and then owned and used all the M cameras (except M5) up to the M9 & Monochrom, all of which I still have. I've taken some of my best images with the M9 and still take it out from time to time. The M240 didn't interest me at all.

 

I started moving to Fuji last year as my eyesight started to deteriorate, making it more difficult to focus with the rangefinder and found I was missing too many shots.

 

Two issues to be aware of with the M9 which are related to the sensor:

1. sensor corrosion issue, where the cover glass on the sensor delaminates. 

2. sensor cracking.

 

I encountered sensor corrosion issues with both of my M9s and the Monochrom sensor which both corroded and cracked. 

The good news is that Leica will repair these free of charge irrespective of the age of the camera. Leica replaced the sensors on all 3 of my cameras FOC.

 

It may not necessarily happen with your M9 and I'm really not trying to dampen your spirits, however it's just something to be aware of.

 

This is what it looks like:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Mike K
Link to post
Share on other sites

You're going to love the M9!

I've been a Leica user since 1976 having started off with an M3 and then owned all the M cameras (except M5) up to the M9 & Monochrom, all of which I still have. I've taken some of my best images with the M9 and still take it out from time to time. The M240 didn't interest me at all.

 

I moved to Fuji last year as my eyesight started to deteriorate, making it more difficult to focus with the rangefinder and found I was missing too many shots.

 

Two issues to be aware of with the M9 which are related to the sensor:

1. sensor corrosion issue where the cover glass on the sensor delaminates. 

2. sensor cracking.

 

I encountered sensor corrosion issues with both of my M9s and the Monochrom sensor both corroded and cracked. 

The good news is that Leica will repair these free of charge irrespective of the age of the camera. Leica replaced the sensors on all 3 of my cameras FOC.

 

It may not necessarily happen with your M9 and I'm really not trying to dampen your spirits, however it's just something to be aware of.

 

This is what it looks like:

Wow...that looks scary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To Leica's credit, it has given birth to a legacy of great shooters and directly influenced the design of cameras over the decades. It also brought us thousands of photographs from the field, especially pictures of war and other extreme circumstances. I'm not wrong to say that at some point in time, Leicas were all over the world used by a great many photographers.

 

The fact that Fujifilm were dubbed the Japanese "Leicas" at one time, says a lot.

 

Also, one can't really compare the photographic results of old film with newer digital Leicas. They're different medium altogether. One thing remains consistent and that is the built quality.

 

Obviously, to keep up with the times, Leica needs to update itself. The challenge isn't with other brands but with themselves, their legacy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An update......

Having spent a couple of days with the M9 its really not for me !

Yes I can focus easily and quickly 

Yes I appreciate the build quality 

 

BUT !!

 

Seriously the final images are in my opinion not good enough and I feel the fuji is a way better better in all sorts of ways

 

I printed work on my normal Hahnemuhle paper and compared with my fuji work 

I showed it to some clients and colleagues and they all chose the fuji prints 

 

So its gone back and have apologised to my collection of fuji cameras for daring to cross the line :)

 

I am glad that I have had this experience and relived my days of M6 and M7 but for me Leica digital is having a bit of a laugh !

Link to post
Share on other sites

[...]

Its the camera Leica should have made 

 

I sure hope not ! It would have costed 9000€ body only and would have to mortage your first born to get a couple of lenses...

 

Leica is still a prestigious name but please let them stay as far away from my Fuji gear for as long I draw breath.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting that the classic designs don't get improved upon much - anyone who can handle an M6 can pick up an X-Pro 2 and everything will be where it's supposed to be (same with an FM2 to an X-T1). After more than 20 years of playing with interfaces (many late film cameras handled like DSLRs), nobody's really improved on 1960s Leica or 1980s Nikon for the basic controls, since even fans of other brands admit that Fujis are about the best handling cameras around today (the only other make I usually hear mentioned in the same breath is Olympus). The sensor on the X-Pro 2 is going to be very close to equivalent to 6x9 cm film (35mm film is often compared to a 6mp sensor, and that was several generations of sensors ago), meaning that we have the image quality of a Texas Leica in the body of a Wetzlar Leica. If Fuji gets into medium format, we'll be looking at large format film image quality in a portable package, probably with excellent handling...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

To Leica's credit, it has given birth to a legacy of great shooters and directly influenced the design of cameras over the decades. It also brought us thousands of photographs from the field, especially pictures of war and other extreme circumstances. I'm not wrong to say that at some point in time, Leicas were all over the world used by a great many photographers.

 

The fact that Fujifilm were dubbed the Japanese "Leicas" at one time, says a lot.

 

Also, one can't really compare the photographic results of old film with newer digital Leicas. They're different medium altogether. One thing remains consistent and that is the built quality.

 

Obviously, to keep up with the times, Leica needs to update itself. The challenge isn't with other brands but with themselves, their legacy.

 

Today I bought the CL. It also works with this one, once you touched it........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...