Jump to content

Fuji 100-400mm Received Today 1st Impressions

Mike K

By Mike K
in Fuji X Lenses

 Share

Recommended Posts

PhilippeVdp Apprentice

PhilippeVdp

Posted
Posted (edited)

On this photo you see the same "issue" what I also saw with the olympus 300mm F4. When branches are really close to the subject, they are shown "double".
Here I don't like the bokeh at all ... just something to remember when taking photos I guess : "make sure that there's sufficiant distance between subject and background"

 

can't wait to test my copy though , it's sitting here waiting until I got a fuji body (xpro2)

 

And a nice great tit (dark, high iso):

24854477589_e60da74a52_c.jpg

 

Edited by PhilippeVdp
Link to post
Share on other sites
Hauxon Newbie

Hauxon

Posted
Posted

I´ve had mine for a week now.   It seems to be the lens we were all hoping for, it's very sharp wide open at 400mm and focus speed and stabilization seem good.  I had the Canon 400/5.6 L before and the 500/4.5 L.  The 500mm lens is the best lens I've ever had and worked great with the 1DsII I had at the time.  The X-T1 + the XF100-400 may not be there but  getting closer and hopefully the X-T2 will have improved tracking capabilities.  Overall I'm very pleased with the lens.

 

Here's a test shot with the X-Pro2 (pre-production model) + XF 100-400.  Lame subject :P ...but great feather detail.

24591950093_bc9fe52e70_o_d.jpg

 

I also think it looks quite nice on my GS X-T1.

24589317594_3b5bbfacdf_o_d.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
paterczm Newbie

paterczm

Posted
Posted

Some more examples (click to enlarge):

 

Cardinal
 

i-7n6p2dx-L.jpg

 

CAMERA Fuji X-T1
LENS XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR
ISO 400
FOCAL LENGTH 400.0 mm (600.0 mm in 35mm)
APERTURE f/9
EXPOSURE TIME 0.002s (1/500)
 
----------------------------------------------------------------
 
Hawk in flight
 
i-cX5sWbB-L.jpg
 
CAMERA Fuji X-T1
LENS XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR
ISO 200
FOCAL LENGTH 400.0 mm (600.0 mm in 35mm)
APERTURE f/10
EXPOSURE TIME 0.00222s (1/450)
 
----------------------------------------------------------------

 

Red Squirrel

 

i-Fhfz3w3-XL.jpg

 

CAMERA Fuji X-T1
LENS XF100-400mmF4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR
ISO 200
FOCAL LENGTH 400.0 mm (600.0 mm in 35mm)
APERTURE f/6.4
EXPOSURE TIME 0.00286s (1/350)
Link to post
Share on other sites
PhilippeVdp Apprentice

PhilippeVdp

Posted
Posted

I use euh don't know the number, the one where the IS only works when you press the shutterbutton.
Mainly for saving some battery power.
 

What I will change next time when I use auto iso with this lens ... change the minimum shutterspeed from 1/60 to 1/180 or even higher.
I had issues where it only used iso 250 but with shutter speed of 1/60 when I was zoomed out to 400mm. 

a bit stupid because people were moving

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Key2104 Newbie

Key2104

Posted
Posted

I received my 100-400 today and I am not convinced. A couple of years ago I downsized from a Canon 5D Mk 2 to an X-E2 because the Canon kit was getting too heavy. I have been very pleased with the camera and the range of lenses that I have bought but I have been missing the long zoom. Well the wait is over and I unpacked the lens this afternoon.

 

A visual inspection showed that the build quality was good but the first issue reared its ugly head. The zoom ring is very stiff. So much so that when I mounted the lens I could feel the play in the mounting between lens and camera. It is so stiff that it is impossible to get fine adjustments in the zoom while panning. I will call Fuji tomorrow and see what they have to say. The second issue is that there is buzzing and slight vibration all the time the camera is turned on. I had this with my L series Canon 100-400 and it seemed if you were unlucky you got a lens that did this but it did not affect the performance of the lens. The final point is £1500 for lens and converter and I get a grubby cloth bag to wrap the lens in! Message to Fuji go buy a Canon 100-400 and see the case you get.

 

I am not going to do any serious testing with the lens until I have spoken with Fuji. Anyone else had similar problems?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nick05 Collaborator

Nick05

Posted
Posted

I received my 100-400 today and I am not convinced. A couple of years ago I downsized from a Canon 5D Mk 2 to an X-E2 because the Canon kit was getting too heavy. I have been very pleased with the camera and the range of lenses that I have bought but I have been missing the long zoom. Well the wait is over and I unpacked the lens this afternoon.

 

A visual inspection showed that the build quality was good but the first issue reared its ugly head. The zoom ring is very stiff. So much so that when I mounted the lens I could feel the play in the mounting between lens and camera. It is so stiff that it is impossible to get fine adjustments in the zoom while panning. I will call Fuji tomorrow and see what they have to say. The second issue is that there is buzzing and slight vibration all the time the camera is turned on. I had this with my L series Canon 100-400 and it seemed if you were unlucky you got a lens that did this but it did not affect the performance of the lens. The final point is £1500 for lens and converter and I get a grubby cloth bag to wrap the lens in! Message to Fuji go buy a Canon 100-400 and see the case you get.

 

I am not going to do any serious testing with the lens until I have spoken with Fuji. Anyone else had similar problems?

the zoom ring on mine was a little stiff at first. Either it loosened up some after the first day of shooting or I became used to it. I haven't noticed any noise coming from it.
Link to post
Share on other sites
darknj Experienced

darknj

Posted
Posted

[...]The second issue is that there is buzzing and slight vibration all the time the camera is turned on. [...]

 

That's normal, it's the same thing with the 18-135 lens, it's the Linear Motor that is in action. 

 

On an older thread we discussed about the LM engine in the lens, it does make some sounds, but not that badly audible for anyone else than the person holding the camera and doesn't affect the quality of the produced image.

At least not on any perceptible level on both the 18-55 and 18-135 lenses.

 

Apparently turning the OIS off does lessen a bit the sound of it, but it doesn't really turn it off completely. There are also some speculations about the lens draining a bit more power, I haven't seen anything to confirm that as I get steadily over 300 shots on the X-T1 using Patona batteries and around 320-350 with Fuji's own batteries before seeing the dreadful red battery icon.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Armagh Apprentice

Armagh

Posted
Posted

I received my 100-400 today and I am not convinced. A couple of years ago I downsized from a Canon 5D Mk 2 to an X-E2 because the Canon kit was getting too heavy. I have been very pleased with the camera and the range of lenses that I have bought but I have been missing the long zoom. Well the wait is over and I unpacked the lens this afternoon.

 

A visual inspection showed that the build quality was good but the first issue reared its ugly head. The zoom ring is very stiff. So much so that when I mounted the lens I could feel the play in the mounting between lens and camera. It is so stiff that it is impossible to get fine adjustments in the zoom while panning. I will call Fuji tomorrow and see what they have to say. The second issue is that there is buzzing and slight vibration all the time the camera is turned on. I had this with my L series Canon 100-400 and it seemed if you were unlucky you got a lens that did this but it did not affect the performance of the lens. The final point is £1500 for lens and converter and I get a grubby cloth bag to wrap the lens in! Message to Fuji go buy a Canon 100-400 and see the case you get.

 

I am not going to do any serious testing with the lens until I have spoken with Fuji. Anyone else had similar problems?

 

Yes I do feel my zoom ring is very stiff coming from a canon 300 f4 lens myself but maybe because of the weight of the lens it needs to be stiff. On my XT10 it does shift in the mount when focusing but that wouldn't really concern me. What did Fuji say about it? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Key2104 Newbie

Key2104

Posted
Posted

I finally got my replacement 100-400 and the zoom ring is stiff but not as bad as the first example. I did not have a lot of time today to use it but my first shot is here: http://www.pbase.com/stewartcclark/image/162910707. The lens still buzzes and I think that it is due to the fact that the lens is constantly focusing without pressing the shutter button the focus tracks. Not sure if I have set something incorrectly in the camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites
dwalme Newbie

dwalme

Posted
Posted

The lens still buzzes and I think that it is due to the fact that the lens is constantly focusing without pressing the shutter button the focus tracks. Not sure if I have set something incorrectly in the camera.

The buzzing you are hearing is the linear motor.  The 50-140mm does it too.   You should be able to hear when using the camera, but it should be barely noticeable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Don Barar
      LUT doesn't works on resolve

      By Don Barar · Posted

      Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • crazyfields
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By crazyfields · Posted

      Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • George_P
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By George_P · Posted

      I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • crazyfields
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By crazyfields · Posted

      First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • DavidJohn
      Unmarked government installation

      By DavidJohn · Posted

      I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...