Jump to content

Pulling the trigger on X100T but any site of successor?

jkundi
 Share

Recommended Posts

jkundi Explorer

jkundi

Posted
Posted

Hi all,

 

I am looking to purchase the X100T this weekend, seeing as holiday seasons are upon us, it may be the perfect choice for me to take out and about with me rather than my X-T1. However I've seen that the X100 line up is refreshed every year or so. Seeing as its been a year since the release of the X100T are we expecting a newer successor soon? I'd hate to purchase only to see a release early next year.  

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
cug Community Regular

cug

Posted
Posted

The X100T is about one year old right now. If Fuji follows the same cycle from before, a new version is due in 6 to 10 months. That could go along with the rumors that the X-Pro2 is coming in January, I expect the next X100 series camera to have the same, hopefully new sensor and some other improvements. 

 

Although, if you like the X100 series, the X100T is a great camera, so if it's the right camera concept for you, go ahead and don't wait, current discounts are pretty good. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
jorgemtrevino Rookie

jorgemtrevino

Posted
Posted

Other than giving it an X mount (interchangeable lenses) I find it perfect as it is now. I don't need 24MP as it means smaller pixel sensors, thus less dynamic range and native ISO. The 16MP sensor gives me gorgeous 22x14 prints that are as large as I can find walls to hang them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • thelostkiwi
      Looking for Full Frame lenses to adapt to GFX

      By thelostkiwi · Posted

      I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Trevor R
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By Trevor R · Posted

      Thank you. I will research it.
    • jerryy
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By jerryy · Posted

      Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Trevor R
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By Trevor R · Posted

      Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • jerryy
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By jerryy · Posted

      Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...