Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello. I'm fairly new to Fuji and have been using the XT-30 with the 18-55 lens for a few months and I'm very impressed. I mainly do travel and landscapes shots with some portraiture and would like to buy a telephoto lens but not sure which one to go for. The 50-140 sounds great but is out of my price range so I'm looking at the 50-230 and 55-200. Has anyone used either or both and has any recommendations in terms of sharpness, practicality etc? Here are the sort of shots I have in mind. Thanks in advance 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The best is the one you can afford, I suppose. I have been an armature to a career pro., using all kinds of gear. While I had some of the best lenses money could buy (and still miss them), I can say that getting a shot with 'lower grade'/affordable in a budget gear is still achievable. Sometimes art is limited by the equipment, often though, it is something to be figured out and overcome. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used both. I currently own an XC50-230, but I no longer own an XF55-200. 

I will use the XC50-230 until it no longer produces images that make me gasp. I like the color and contrast of the XC better than the XF, although the XF was sometimes a little sharper.

If I ever move up to a better telephoto, it will cost ten times what I paid for my XC50-230, and it will weigh four times as much. And I think it a wise move on your part to consider weight in a travel lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...

Following this in case of any further updates! 
 

I have an X-T30 and would like a telephoto lens to give me more reach for landscape shots and the option to try wildlife photography.

I’m struggling to decide between the 55-200 and 70-300, it seems there are pros and cons for both. 
 

Any recommendations are welcome!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...