Jump to content

Hermelin

Members
  • Posts

    426
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

Everything posted by Hermelin

  1. I ended up with the x100f 😀
  2. I wonder if we can expect a new lens. I guess it will have the new Xtrans sensor (same as X-T3)?
  3. Hoping for X100f successor to come out early 2019. x100 - 2011x100s -2013x100t - 2014x100f - 2017x??? - 2019?
  4. Leaning towards the x100f right now. Bookeh seems smoother on the x100f @ f/2 than on the 27 @ f/2.8. Also, I get the impression that the x100f is more robust built than the X-E3
  5. I'm going through a personal crisis and sold my gear 1-2 months ago. I had the X-T2 with 18-55, 35 f/2 & 90 f/2. Now I'm missing shooting with a real camera. As much as I enjoyed my X-T2 I think I want something even smaller and less conspicuous. Therefor I'm eyeing the x100f and the X-E3 with the 27 f/2.8 (to start with). How does these 2 lenses compare to eachother? 1. I heard that the x100f f/2 lens is soft in close ups. How does the 27 f/2.8 work in closeups? 2. Will I get same amount of bokeh of these 2 lenses? 3. How is sharpness compared to eachother and generel IQ. Does any of them have that magic dust that the 35 f/1.4 and 18 f/2 have?
  6. They're equally good pretty much. Decide on which focal lenght what suits you best. I personally prefer 35 f/2 because I shot a lot of shots of candid shots, but 23 f/2 would be more useful for indoors shooting.
  7. I always had the impression that the 35 f/2 was better than the 23 f/2 optically. 50, I'm not sure. Eitherway, I would love to have the 1.4 but I probably need that extra af speed when I shot my kids running around like crazy. I fear that the AF on the 1.4 wouldn't be sufficent.
  8. OT question, but I noticed you have both the 16 and 18. Which one do you use the most and in what situation do you use resp.?
  9. Still tempted to swith my 35 f/2 because of 1.4 and "magic rendering" against this. But my mind says no because of "af speed and WR"
  10. https://500px.com/filiphermelin
  11. No news on the rumord 18 f/2 MK2. It's been over a year since first rumord
  12. I have the 35 f/2 as well Im keeping the 90. I want to sell my 18-55 and get wide angle prime instead, 18 or 16.
  13. If I was into video recording, I'd consider getting it, but I'm not, so I'm more than satisfied with my X-T2
  14. Fujrumors is a source for rumors from credible sources which has been proven being correct 9/10 times. You're just a member in a forum like me. But if you have a reliable source I would like to know what kind of source. I just find it hard to believe that you know anything before FUJIRUMORS does I don't know, I don't have any source. But it would make no sense if the 18 f/2 MK II would be as a big as the 16 f/1.4. One of the selling point of the 18 is the size.
  15. lol, what source. I'm sure FUJIRUMORS.com has more sources and I haven't heard anything about the 18 being same size as the 16.
×
×
  • Create New...