Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Friends,

I think that this is an interesting conversation.

I admit that the girl in the window is very similar to Steve McCury (which is one of my favorites) photo. I didn't meant to copy him.it just happened.

I was just landed in Mumbai after a long flight, got into a Taxi with the camera on my neck and on the first stop light it happened. I just turned the camera to the window and made one click and then the taxi go.

I guess that similar thing happened to Steve:

Still, it is not exactly the same. I think that Steve's is better :). And also he used Nikon and Kodak chrome.

I agree that as photographers we should be careful not to mimic the iconic photos and be original. Here it was not planned. So, it was produced originally. The only problem is that a very famous master already did it (and much better). Do you suggest me not to show it? I wish we could ask Steve, what he thinks about that…

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a great capture Erez.  Not one that is easy to get I'd imagine.  I say show it.  We draw inspiration from many sources and sometimes we may produce something that looks similar to another photographer.

 

The only way I wouldn't show this photo is if you staged it, but I have strong doubts you did.  You most likely didn't even realize it until much later, if ever, that it was similar to McCurry's.  When moments like this happen, you have to capture them and hope that you are able to produce something captivating.  You did that my friend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Almost everything we shoot has been done before, that's just the reality of the billions of pictures that are taken every year now. Really think what you're doing is unique? Think again.
I like Gregory Heisler and Dan Winters a lot. It's bound to show up in my own work sooner or later, most likely unintentional. We mimic what we like.

 

And I agree, I like Erez's more too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Rainy day in India, hardly unusual, street vendor children or begging children (unfortunately not unusual too) looking in a cab.

 

People in the cab take pictures, hundreds of them fail, this one was a good one and better than McCurry’s photograph.

 

Well done, deserve praise for it and you should certainly show it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...