Jump to content

Should i buy Fuji x-e2 in 2019


Recommended Posts

Yes, if the price is right.  It's still an excellent camera, with a great balance of good handling with light weight, plus a good evf and excellent image quality.

The second hand prices tend to low now the X-E3 has been out a while.

I have an X-T2 now, but still use my X-E2 with the smaller primes when I want to save weight.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I love the X-E series.  I just upgraded to the X-E3 because I found the 80mm macro a tad slow with it.  If it weren't for the fact that I was buying the XF80 I probably wouldn't have upgraded.  It was fast enough for everyday activities... family, vacation, day outings etc.  Image quality is excellent up to ISO 3200 and quite usable to ISO 6400.  I definitely recommend it on a limited budget, prices are quite low right now (used).

I wish the X-E3 had maintained the same size of camera and viewfinder... sometimes it's just a little small.  It works well with the kit lens (XF18-55) and the XF55-200.  Makes for an amazing starter set.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Because the sensor assembly is moved electrmagnetically. When there is no power it is essentially free moving.
    • Ahoy ye hearties! Hoist ye yon Jolly Roger and Cascade away. NGC 1502 The Jolly Roger Cluster:

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      This is the equivalent of 43 minutes, 40 seconds of exposure. NGC 1502 is a neat little cluster located in the Camelopardalis Constellation. This region of space was thought to be fairly empty by early astronomers, but as you can see, there is a lot there. Kemble's Cascade (a.k.a. Kemble 1) is named for Father Lucian Kemble, a Canadian Franciscan friar who wrote about it to Walter Scott Houston, an author for the Sky And Telescope magazine. Houston named the asterism for Fr. Kemble and the name "stuck". NGC 1501 is the Oyster Nebula. A longer focal length telescope is needed to bring this one into good viewing range, but it is well worth the effort. NGC 1502: https://skyandtelescope.org/online-gallery/ngc-1502/ Camelopardalis Constellation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelopardalis Kemble's Cascade (and NGC 1501: The Oyster Nebula): https://www.constellation-guide.com/kembles-cascade/ Arrrrrr Matey.
    • Looking for input; there are some decent deals and might want to take advantage to expand my lenses for my 100s already own: 110/2 32-64 35-70 100-200 + TC   Shooting mostly family shots, bringing my kit to capture family outings indoors and out. Tracking the 63/43 effective FLs on the two, but has anybody used both? Would the 55 (covered by two zooms right now) be redundant? Would the 80 be too similar in character to my 110 for portraiture?
    • See what I mean? Two instantaneous ads. Worthless.   
×
×
  • Create New...