Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'd of thought the x-t10 was a perfect camera to launch the f2 with.

 

The Pro2 is probably too far away.

 

So what does Fuji have planned with the f2 launch?

 

It's a perfect kit lens, so is there another body soon?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ways of marketing work in mysterious and wondrous ways...

 

 

We’ll get there when we’ll get there not a minute before or later.

 

Since we were kids we know that asking “ are we there yet ? “ won’t make the car go any faster.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd of thought the x-t10 was a perfect camera to launch the f2 with.

The Pro2 is probably too far away.

So what does Fuji have planned with the f2 launch?

It's a perfect kit lens, so is there another body soon?

The 35mm is hardly a perfect kit lens for a consumer DSLR style body - the camera needed to launch with a normal zoom to be competitive with the entry level offerings of Nikon and Canon. On the other hand, it's the perfect kit lens for the X-Pro2, which is targeted at an experienced user group, all who are probably familiar with the use of prime lenses.

 

It will launch with the X-Pro2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 35mm is hardly a perfect kit lens for a consumer DSLR style body - the camera needed to launch with a normal zoom to be competitive with the entry level offerings of Nikon and Canon. On the other hand, it's the perfect kit lens for the X-Pro2, which is targeted at an experienced user group, all who are probably familiar with the use of prime lenses.

 

It will launch with the X-Pro2.

You could make good points for either approach but I believe the XT10 would only sell more if it had been launched with an option to buy the 35f2 in a bundle.   Once you've used the XT10 you realize that it really moves farther away from the dslr style even though there is a more subtle hump and the evf is centered.   The size of the XT10 with the 27 and I'm sure the 35f2 is perfect and Fuji could still offer additional bundles with the other standard zooms.    Either way I don't really see the XT10 targeting the entry level dslr offerings as much as the other mirrorless cameras like the a6000 and the mid-range Olympus cameras.   If I remember correctly Olympus bundled one of their cameras with the 17f1.8 lens.   But you're probably right that the XPro2 is an even better option to bundle the 35f2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having some idea of how the mind of marketeers work, I would concur that the 35mm f2, based on its retro look, will be probably introduced with the first camera to arrive on the market with a similar retro look.

 

If that would be ( as it might realistically be) the X Pro 2 ( although logic would have suggested a shorter focal length, to match the wishes , if not the needs, of most so called modern “ street photographers” ) Fuji only can tell.

 

I don’t think that the unveiling of the X Pro 2 will happen any earlier than the Photokina 2016.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuji had done a very logical sequence of lens releases. The X-Pro1 and the initial three lenses were the classic photojournalist's kit. It made the X-cameras immediately viable. Since then, they have added a "kit lens" beyond the quality of any other on the market. A few very useful zooms followed by high-end zooms in comparable fields of view with Canikon. Amazing in so few years. With the exception of super-telephotos, we are well covered. Now it is a matter of more specialized lenses filling in the perceived gaps. 

We have a "normal" lens and it is superb. An f/2.0 is a nice bonus for shooters looking for a lighter, cheaper, more compact lens. A few years down the line, a f/0.9 might find a few sales. The f/1.4 is a pro-am workhorse. A focal length of 135mm is not all that popular, but enough are being sold to keep them in production. Fuji's 90mm has the same FOV and is apparently a superb lens. I have shot with 135mm lenses on Niko and have a 90mm Canon Serenar for the X-Pro1 in a Leica screw mount. Not good for Fuji and not a focal length I favour. However, it is a good lens beyond the basics.

Happily, the X-mount is being served by other lens makers. Nice to have Zeiss on board and the Samyang family. I recently traveled with the Samyang 8mm, using it as a super-wide rather than capitalizing on its distortion, and came off with some spectacular shots. In the history of photography, the f/2.0 will find quite a bit of favour, but it is certainly in the third or fourth wave of lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software  to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
    • How does one make sure that Fuji's image correction is turned on to correct barrel and pin-cushion distortion on a GFX 100 or GFX100S when using the GF20-35? Is it only applied to the jpegs and not to the raw files? (I was surprised to discover the barrel distortion on the GF 35-70mm lens.) I normally shoot in raw with jpeg back-up and use the raw files, which I convert either in Affinity Photo 2 when editing with that program or in Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 by Silkypix if I wish to process the image in Photoshop CS6. (Adobe DNG is also a possibility.) Thank you for the help. Trevor
    • Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...