Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

 Fairly new to interchangeable lenses  and a total novice in the arena of adapters for non-fuji x lenses.  I would like to buy a Zeiss 85mm zf nikon lens for my fuji xt2.  What adapter would be the best for this?

 

Thanks in advance

BBestone

Link to post
Share on other sites

To the best of my knowledge there are no adapters that allow any electrical communication between camera and lens. This means that focus is only possible in manual mode and the aperture can not be controlled by the camera. So when you set the aperture ring on the lens let's say to 8 the apertur actually will close to 8. On a Nikon camera the aperture would stay full open to give you a bright view finder until you press the shutter button. Then the camera would close the aperture, take the picture, and open the aperture.

 

The simplest adapters can not be used with Nikon G lenses as these do not have an aperture ring but need the camera to control the aperture. (Remember, no electrical communication.) However, even some very cheap adapters like the Quenox do have an aperture ring on the adapter. On my Novoflex adapter, not the cheapest adapter, I can preset the aperture on the lens. If I turn the aperture ring on the adapter to one side the aperture is full open. If I turn it to the other side it closes to the preset value. I guess other adapters work the same way. On the Novoflex the ring does not have any marks and no clicks. The Metabones adapter has marks labeled 1, 2, 3..

 

Normal adapters will not change the focal lens. You have to consider the crop of the APS-C sensor versus full frame. The 85 mm Zeiss will not give the typical portrait field of view but more of a mid range tele. On APS-C a 56.67 mm lens would be the portrait lens. A 85 mm lens gives the field of view like a 135 mm lens on full frame. (127.5 mm to be more precise.)

 

There are adapters which change the focal lens like the Metabones Speedbooster. It multiplies the focal lens with 0.71. Thus a 85 mm lens will behave like a 60mm lens on an APS-C camera which is very close to the field of view on a full frame. Additionally the aperure will be multiplied with the same factor. So it gives you about one stop more open. Yes, it becomes brighter! The speedbooster is much more expensive than adapters that do not change focal lens. Quenox is another speed booster with 0.72 reduction. Quenox is much cheaper but seems to be not as good as the Metabones but still good according to the internet. I believe there are other Chinese made ones.

 

My Novoflex works like it should and I have never read any complaints about Novoflex adapters. However, there are some complaints about some cheaper adapters that they were too tight or too lose and that people had to return them once or twice until they got one that was ok.

 

I have a Quenox macro extension ring, in fact they come as a pair with 10 and 16 mm. They work fine but have a little slackness which allows to twist the adapter against the camera and the lens against the adapter a little bit. This sometimes interrupts the electrical communication. Then I have to twist the lens a bit and it works. The slackness has no effect on the image quality. Note, this is a Fuji X camera to Fuji X lens adapter. So it is easy to provide electrical comunication as it does not need any translation between Fuji speak on one side and Nikon speak on the other side.

 

I hope this helps a bit.

 

Edit: Some typos corrected and some wordings are now hopefuly better to understand

Edited by Jürgen Heger
Link to post
Share on other sites

Milandro, you are absolutely right. I forgot to mention that the adapters with aperture ring on the adapter, like my Novoflex or the Quenox also work with Nikon G lenses.

 

Do you know who makes the adapter with electrical aperture? I understand that they still havo no auto focus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are experimental adapters trying to do this with contax and Fuji, maybe one day someone would make one for NIKON

 

Fujifilm-X-Contax-N-Adapter-electronic-7

 

http://www.fujirumors.com/words-first-fujifilm-x-contax-n-smart-adapter-autofocus-electronic-aperture-control-canon-ef-possible-future/

 

Kipon makes a very expensive adapter with separate electrics to control Canon EF lenses.

 

kipon_eos_fx_e_01.jpg

 

But for OP the Nikon g adapters should suffice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
×
×
  • Create New...