Jump to content

What is happening in this photo? Is it banding?


Recommended Posts

I took these pictures with the Fuji X-T2. This issue only happened on these photos. I'm not sure what caused it. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Brooklynboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes,  banding due to the light frequency interfering with the electronic shutter.

 

Many forms of artificial light are not continuous but intermittent producing on-off light cycles with a certain speed.

 

The same happens also with television or cinema screens.

 

If you shoot at speed faster than the  frequency of the light source this will returns bands of light where the light is effectively off when you shot the picture.

 

In the olden days you could also check the shutter speed by counting the lines of the television screen (different in PAL or NTSC). I suspect that this light source was a LED. You can also observe bands of different color ( Green and Magenta) as the the light switches between on and off.

 

Shooting at a longer shutter  (1/30 to 1/15 )speed should take care of this.

 

 

Find here an article which will help you.

 

 

https://www.getdpi.com/forum/fuji/56729-fuji-x-electronic-shutter-test-banding.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it does,  read the article and not, 1/60 is not (always) long enough  depends on the light source.

 

There are differences between fluorescent tubes and led and tungsten.

 

Besides there is a difference in 50Hz. or 60Hz.  current between countries using different systems.

 

 

We’ve already spoken about this

 

http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/836-how-can-you-avoid-banding-using-the-mechanical-shutter-under-fluorescent-lights/

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hmm, had not realised that it would be possible for banding to occur with a plane shutter. However, it seems to me that it would be a much rarer occurrence. Interesting, in that specific case the banding would be linked to the speed of the shutter as opposed to the shutter speed ^_^

Edited by Florian
Link to post
Share on other sites

and to the light source.

 

of course this doesn’t happen if the shutter speed is long enough. One very important reason to stop thinking that shooting at 1.2 with depth of field paper thin would be a very good idea in a lot of situations

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

TS, what shutter speed u use?

it depends on where u stay and what electricity frequency ur place uses

my place uses 50 Hz...so if my shutter speed can be divided by 50, my pic will be free of banding...for example, 1/50, 1/75, 1/100...etc

but if i use odd shutter speed that is not multiples of 50 like 1/60, 1/120...my pic will have bandings

Link to post
Share on other sites

TS, what shutter speed u use?

it depends on where u stay and what electricity frequency ur place uses

my place uses 50 Hz...so if my shutter speed can be divided by 50, my pic will be free of banding...for example, 1/50, 1/75, 1/100...etc

but if i use odd shutter speed that is not multiples of 50 like 1/60, 1/120...my pic will have bandings

 

That's a clever observation. 60hz where I live, though this banding problem isn't something I've encountered so far.

 

The shallow depth of field in the pictures, and overall lack of sharpness suggest a hand held camera at a relatively low shutter speed, probably with the lens close to full aperture. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Would using an external charger be of benefit to the batteries life? I appreace it can be faster, but I doin't mind pluging in the camera over USB to charge. Does charging via the camera do as good a job as lets say the fuji's own external charger? Does the camera stop charging once the battry is full and not over charge? I couldn't find these deatails in these forums or in the manual. Thank you!   Image below shot on X-T2 in a sunny studio.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • It is really easy to find out if the wifi is on. Your computer or tablet or cell phone will have a network settings dealing with wifi, bluetooth, ethernet or “other”. Open that up and go into the section for wifi, and take note of which networks are listed. Turn on the camera and keep watching the list of networks. If your camera’s wifi is turned on, a new network should suddenly show up in your computer/tablet/phone’s network listings. Now go into the camera’s menus and start a wireless connection (the x-app or camera remote app can help you with this). You should see a network show up now. It is not hidden because it has to be visible so that your computer/tablet/phone can join the camera’s network to transfer images. Turn the camera off and that network should disappear. Turn the camera back on and see what happens.
    • Sweet Creek Falls, Oregon. X-H1, Viltrox 13mm F1.4, Acros.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • I think my Fuji 150-600 F8 is a brilliant wildlife lens in terms of sharpness, portability and value but the small aperture does cause issues at the start and end of the day - even pushing the ISO as far as I dare, I can see shutter speed down to 1/25s - stabilisation isn't an issue but asking a deer to stand still for that is too much! In the same situation, an F4 would give 1/100s so the difference to the success rate would be phenomenal... and that's without the other improvements like shallower depth of field. I also find that the Fuji's subject detect AF gets pretty iffy in low light - I keep updating to the latest firmware but it doesn't seem to get any better. I was originally looking at the Nikon 500mm F4 E but good examples secondhand are still reasonably expensive but like-for-like Sigma lenses are around half the price. Reviews I have read suggest that they are as good optically, AF performance and IS-wise but you gain a few hundred grams of weight (but less than the older Nikon model). For a couple of grand, I can live with that. Does anyone have any experience mounting one on an XH2S? What about with the 1.4 teleconverter? It feels like that is pushing it anyway - hefty lens + TC + Fringer all sounds a bit...wobbly? It is on the Fringer approved list but I am wary about AF speed in particular. I had also considered looking for a used Nikon 400mm F2.8, which would be even faster (and heavier) and could couple with a TC to give 560mm F4 but again, it is that lens+TC+Fringer combination that worries me as being just too many links in the chain. Of course, what I really want is a native Fuji prime but that doesn't seem to be on the horizon - and if you look at what Nikon and Sony are doing, if Fuji do ever bring out a 500mm prime, it will probably be a small, light and cheapish F5.6, which is only 2/3 stop better than my zoom at the same focal length. Any thoughts anyone?
    • The Amazon link is an annoying feature of this forum - its automatic and is applied to every post for advertising purposes. My question was - how do you know the camera wi-fi is on and requires turning off? I would have thought this would just use up the battery for no purpose if you aren't specifically using a function that requires wi-fi.
×
×
  • Create New...