Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So, I have had my X-T2 for about 2 weeks now, and in the last two days I noticed a squeaking sound sometimes when turning it off. I sounds like a bird moved in to the camera body, and it can easily be heard from a meter away in a quiet room. Right now it happens every time. I can say for sure that it wasn't there from the beginning.

 

I removed the stabilized lens and it still made the sound, so I went in to the menu and run sensor cleaning manually from there, and it again made the sound, although at a slower rate.

 

It's two squeaks, within a second when turning off the camera, and if done through the menu it's about a twice as long pause between the squeaks. (This tells me that it probably runs the cleaning for a bit longer when done manually through the menu)

 

Have anyone else run into this? I guess I need to contact Fujifilm but I wanted to see if it's a common thing first. It's actually quite annoying and could even be an issue in a quiet space where electronic shutter would otherwise allow for camera use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Yeah it sure is a challenge to put something this complex together from drawing board to finished product. Low tolerances both in mechanics and electronics. It has to work reliably in all kinds of environments with spot on accuracy.

 

I find it amazing that it's possible to make large quantities of these things and most of them work just as intended. A few are bound to fail, and mine did. Oh well. It works now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...