Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For all of you, struggling how to import them into Capture One:

 

Copy them to Macintosh HD/Library/ColorSync/Profiles

 

Restart Capture One. You will find them in Base Characteristics.

 

The Import Process in Capture One will not work, because they are not made with Capture One itself.

 

This mighty be the reason why Capture One will freeze for some time at the beginning. Don't close the App. Just wait. It seems to take some time. 

 

I closed my App. Damn. My catalog it's broke or something. I have to use the last automatic backup but I've lost all of my preview.

But yes, profiles works.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Anyone getting these to work with the new Capture One Pro v10 ?

My mac running the new C1 v10 is giving me the beachball when I select any of the custom X-T1 profiles :(

On my system (Mac Pro-Sierra) everything is in order with CO Pro 10

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also unable to get the profiles to work with CO Pro 10. They show in the Dropdown list, but when I select any of them, the selection reverts to "ICC" and the image becomes greyscale. They are however still working perfectly with CO Pro 9. 

 

Anyone has any clue what I should do? I've reinstalled CO Pro 10, reinstalled the ICC profiles, but the problem persists. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On my system (Mac Pro-Sierra) everything is in order with CO Pro 10

 

 

On mine (maxed out iMac 5k with Sierra), everything is working fine, too...

 

Mine is also a maxed out iMac 5k with Sierra. Got it working. My main archive is a huuuuge C1 Catalog. When applying profiles to a picture C1 is giving me the beachball.

If I create a fresh session/catalog - everything is OK :)

Edited by DrLaban
Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone getting these to work with the new Capture One Pro v10 ?

My mac running the new C1 v10 is giving me the beachball when I select any of the custom X-T1 profiles :(

 

Just be patient. The Profiles are not made with C1. So it takes some time to adopt it, every time you start C1. The Beachball comes 2 or 3 times, then you are good to go. 

 

DON'T QUIT THE APP DURING BEACHBALL!!! You'll risk a damage of your catalog!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine is also a maxed out iMac 5k with Sierra. Got it working. My main archive is a huuuuge C1 Catalog. When applying profiles to a picture C1 is giving me the beachball.

If I create a fresh session/catalog - everything is OK :)

 

 

+1! Same here!

 

5K with maximum configuration. The bigger the catalog, the longer the beachball appears. 2-3 times, then your are good to go. I guess C1 applies the profiles to all of the images. Remember, "factory default" C1 comes with only 1 profile!  

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

I install the profiles in a different way (have done this since they first came out)

In applications I choose Capture One (now version 10Pro) and in the large alias right click and choose "show package contents" then go to the input profiles folder

using the path: contents/frameworks/AppCore.framework/Resources/Profiles/input and copy them to this input folder.

The Profiles must be in the correct format otherwise Capture One will not recognize them. Cleaned up of extra information. I am uploading a few as examples

When they are inserted in this way they show up for the specific camera along with the generic profile for that camera in the dropdown menu

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I install the profiles in a different way (have done this since they first came out)

In applications I choose Capture One (now version 10Pro) and in the large alias right click and choose "show package contents" then go to the input profiles folder

using the path: contents/frameworks/AppCore.framework/Resources/Profiles/input and copy them to this input folder.

The Profiles must be in the correct format otherwise Capture One will not recognize them. Cleaned up of extra information. I am uploading a few as examples

When they are inserted in this way they show up for the specific camera along with the generic profile for that camera in the dropdown menu

I follow the same process.  ;)

What do you mean when you say "cleaned up of extra information"?

 

Thanks

Edited by marpar
Link to post
Share on other sites

I follow the same process.  ;)

What do you mean when you say "cleaned up of extra information"?

 

Thanks

 

When I downloaded the latest profiles they looked like this: FujiXT1-1. Provia (X-Pro2).icm.

to have them recognized in C1 10PRO on my Mac running OS X 10.11.6 I had to correct them to: FujiXT1-Provia (X-Pro2).icm

Link to post
Share on other sites

for me the beach-ball problem is solved:

 

I removed all the film simulation profiles from the ...\library\colorsync directory (I am on CO10 latest version)

put them in the app container as suggested by archidss, on 11 Jan 2017 - 8:03 PM (above here).

Also removed the extraneous spaces from the filenames, (left the numbers in place) and renamed the extension from icc to icm (so: FujiXPro2-1.Provia.icm)

 

​restarted the computer, starting CO the first time took a bit longer. Profiles appeared in the recommend profile list and could be applied instantaneous, without any spinning beachball while using a large database (120k+ images, 180 GB)

after closing and restarting CO again I had a normal CO10 start-up time, profiles in the recommended list could be applied instantaneous without any spinning beachball.

 

Still in contact with Phase One on this.

 

Hans.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

  

@fleckintosh and @Ario: The result is awesome! Thanks a lot!

 

I compared these film simulations with the C1 Extended Filmstyle Set. The result is much more subtle and much better aligned to the JPEGs straight from the camera. I definitively recommend using these styles, not the ones from C1.

 

The procedure is a bit complex, so let me summarize for all the newcomers. The result will be, that these great Fuji film simulations provided by fleckinthosh are saved as C1 ICC profiles, specific for your camera (X-T1, X-Pro2, X-T2) and can be used regulary in C1 under Basic Characteristics without any hassles:

 

1) Download the ICC files from Dropbox-Download, either for X-T1 or X-Pro2 (look at the end of the file name for X-Pro2). I used the X-Pro2 files for my X-T2, because the X-T2 has the same sensor as the X-Pro2. So far, all works fine.

 

2) Copy the downloaded files to the correct C1 directory. The directory locations are:

On a Mac system the custom ICC profile will be located in: Users/UserX/Library/Colorsync/Profiles

On a Windows system the profiles will be located in: Users/UserX/AppData/CaptureOne/Color Profiles

 

3) Start C1, select a picture taken with the camera you want to save the film simulation for (i.e. X-T1, X-Pro2 or X-T2, depending on the files you downloaded)

 

4) Apply the desired profile to this picture (taken with the selected camera, i.e. X-T1, X-Pro2 or X-T2), by selecting this profile from Base Characteristics/ICC Profiles/Fuji/XT-1 (the tool Base Characteristics is in the Color Tool Tab)

 

5) Open the Advanced Color Editor

 

6) Save settings as ICC profile giving a useful name (the correct camera name is already there). I did use a naming as "FujiXT2-C_1.Provia", where "C" stands for "color", and "FujiXT2-B_1.Acros", with "B" for Black & White. With the numbering, all appears later in a nice order

 

7) Close C1, go to the Color Profiles directory and delete the temporary files (the ones downloaded)

 

8) Start C1 again, go to the Color Tool Tab and Base Characteristics, then choose under ICC Profiles the option only display recommended. Then only the ICC profiles matching the camera used will be shown and the list of ICC profiles becomes much shorter and better in overview

 

From then on, you can select the Fuji film style from Base Characteristic/ICC Profiles and the result is already shown in the picture, when the cursor is located over the style name. Because I do that very first, I have added the tool Base Characteristics in the Lens Correction Tool Tab, then I apply lens correction and film simulation in one go.

 

That's it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...