Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi There, I'm a new GFX 100s user. I'm a pro and have shot Phase One, Hasselblad, and Pentax Medium Format systems for years. I use LRC to catalog and import files (except for with PhaseOne, only Capture One for that). I REALLY dig the GFX 100s camera, very modern, very easy to set up and use, just suits my style of shooting, and reminds me of the best of the Sony A7r series cameras in terms of functionality. 

But I'm not wrapping my head around the image processing and film sim profile thing. In LR when you import it shows up looking like you set it in camera (in RAW only). But then does that thing where LR processes the thumbnail using their preset profiles. I set it to use the Camera Settings profile, but it's still pretty far off from the JPG if you shoot Raw +Jpg. I ran it through Capture One, and it definitely retains the profiling better than LR does, but absolutely does not match the JPG in terms of tonality and optics correction. I am fine with the QUALITY of the raw processing in LR, I just want to retain the 'look' of the from camera to post vis a vis the film sim settings. 

Generally in the past I always turned off all profiling and camera processing settings, preferring a flat, neutral image to start post with. But this Fuji has REALLY nice in camera options that you purportedly can change afterwards. Any advice for how to maintain the camera settings profile preferably within the Adobe Ecosystem? I really use the LR catalog and only use CaptureOne when I have to because I shot on PhaseOne. 

 

Thanks in advance,

 

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strictly staying only in the Adobe system may be tricky.

There is a way to stay “close” though by only adding one step in the conversion process. Grab a copy of Fujifilm’s X Raw Studio and use it to convert the raw .RAF image to a TIFF image and import that back into the Adobe software. X Raw Studio connects to the camera and uses the camera’s hardware to convert the image instead of using your computer to do so, so the result should be as close as possible to an exact match for the raw + jpg images you are currently getting.

User guide: https://fujifilm-x.com/en-us/stories/fujifilm-x-raw-studio-features-users-guide/

X Raw Studio is free, that link also lets you download it as well as giving you the installation instructions.

Here is an article (a bit long-winded) about Fujifilm’s simulations:

https://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2020/08/18/fujifilm-film-simulations-definitive-guide

If you ever decide to venture outside of the Adobe / C1 worlds, apps such as DarkTable and RawTherapee do give you pretty good conversions.

p.s. Welcome to the forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response and the welcome. I appreciate the link. My workflow right now keeps everything in Raw, then roundtrips it out to PS for final retouch and processing. I guess if I convert in another program like X Raw, it just adds a step before sending out to PS. 

Thanks again, I'll post back with how I find this process. 

 

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should mention it is possible to use CLUTs (color lookup tables) or just LUTs directly in Photoshop, so you may have some good fortune trying that. But I should also mention I have not used Adobe's software in some time, so I cannot really give you much in the way of help for doing that beyond saying that it is possible.

https://photoshopcafe.com/use-luts-photoshop-install-luts-photoshop/

LUTs are similar to simulations, so if you find sources that give you the look you want, you should be able to directly use them in PS and LR. (LUTs are camera specific, so you need to find a source for GFX-100s LUTs).

If you want to use your computer instead of your camera to do the conversions, Fujifilm also has the free Raw Converter software that will let you apply the simulations as you wish and export files either as TIFF or jpgs. [Some folks are going to claim this is heresy and you will be better off using LR and C1, so be it.] You can grab a copy at:

https://fujifilm-x.com/en-us/products/software/raw-file-converter-ex-powered-by-silkypix/

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a setting in LR where upon import you can select "Camera" settings.  This way the raw file keeps the sim mode.  This is what I use.  However, I'm on the road traveling and can't get to my LR catalog right now.  When I import my 100s and 50r files the raw files do retain the actual sim used and does not "convert" it to the Adobe profile.  If I can figure it out remotely I'll post again.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...