Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wich raw converter is the best foor XT5 files ?, I found really different results in using Capture one express or silkypix, the level of details that i see with silkypix is much better of the details that i see with C1, clearly looking ant the same RAF file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

“Best” is very subjective, and I’m always wary about answering questions phrased that way; that being said *I* use DxO pure raw3 in conjunction with Lightroom Classic.  With that, I share a linked collection that allows me to access my Lightroom classic catalog with Lightroom Cloud, giving me viewing and editing capability across the internet and all my mobile devices.  

Edited by Edp
Link to post
Share on other sites

Typically, you'd choose amongst the three big ones: Lightroom, Capture One, or DxO Photo Lab. They're not cheap, but they're popular for a reason. 

Or try the free Darktable or Rawtherapee, but you'll have to check whether the X-T5 is supported yet. (By downloading the software and opening one of your files. They're free, after all.) 

Edited by bastibe
Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition to those mentioned so far, there is also SilkyPix. This is the “big brother / big sister” to the free Raw Converter app that Fujifilm gives you. Here is the link for products and cameras compatibilty:

https://silkypix.isl.co.jp/en/product/search-camera-support/

There is a tab to click on to get to the home page and explore the features offered by each app.

 

Note: If you want to try the open source apps RawTherapee or Dark Table but find they may not yet support your camera, you can submit some images to them to use to get your camera included:

https://rawpedia.rawtherapee.com/Adding_Support_for_New_Raw_Formats

https://www.darktable.org/resources/camera-support/

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the way C1Pro renders my X and GFX files.  I've been a LR user since Beta 1A in 2006-07 and I still use it for culling, minor editing, and cataloging/storing but my main image processor is Capture One.  I will say I've used Silkypix as well with my X files and it comes darn close to C1Pro but nothing, IMHO beats Capture One.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use Adobe ACR (almost identical to LR)... then open in PS Photoshop. If you turn off sharpening, then open and edit in PS - no worms at all. The extra colour/definition you can achieve in PS is just incredible. Lately just using the jpegs from my X-T3, getting almost identical results. Just set to DR200 and Highlights to -2 (dynamic range is just incredible - no blown out highlights anymore) about the same as my EOS r6 mk11 raws - just wow!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...