Jump to content

I've handled a pre-production X-T2; nothing new, but can confirm some things


Recommended Posts

"Stealth" street shooting just makes me think of all the comic and video game conventions I used to go to where they had to start putting up specific notices warning people to not try to sneakily take photos up girls' skirts. Don't be That Guy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's probably not the most interesting feature anyway, but there is no USB 3.0* from what you said.

 

If it looks like a Micro-B, it's USB 2.0.

Here is what USB 3.0* Micro-B looks like, you can't miss it because it's really wide and there is a distinctive notch:

 

http://img.dxcdn.com/productimages/sku_172255_2.jpg

 

(I'm putting a link to copy/paste, otherwise non logged members can't see the pictures)

 

Some people are selling USB 3.0* A to USB 3.0* Mini-B, but that's pure scam as there is no Mini-B compatible with USB 3.0* speeds.

 

 

 

* We should be saying USB 3.1 Gen 1 and not USB 3.0, but let's not make the USB consortium proud of themselves for this really confusing renaming ^^

Link to post
Share on other sites

Huh, yeah, it wasn't one of those, it didn't have that notch IIRC. So I guess that means it's actually USB 2.0? I don't work with mini/micro versions enough to know which is available with what. (Ditto for the HDMI and audio in/outs.) But that'd make more sense given how little Fuji care about tethering, and there aren't many other uses for a USB. Ah well. Bit of a shame.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another possibility is that they only use the better charging abilities of the USB 3.0 protocol.

Hence why they wouldn't need the full size port.

I guess we'll know soon enough anyway ;)

 

Thanks for sharing your experience anyway!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see the negativity of touchscreen (although I've never used one on a camera) but I could see the merits of it when reviewing images or during video recording.  And I don't see it being that much of a impact on price either.  But Fuji could implement multiple methods for doing the same functions.  For example, my Mazda6 can change radio stations/functions via touch screen, control knob on the center console or via the steering wheel.  Works out great for those that might have gloves, or the passenger can change stations/functions and don't have to get the screen dirty with greasy fingers.  In the same way one could use the touchscreen to review images, or the joy-stick or the control dial.  But like many have chimed in, it should have a off feature for those who absolutely loath touchscreens or feels like it gets in their way.

Edited by EddieX
Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting that Patrick's source has now confirmed USB3.0 (or 3.1, or whatever), as he's posted on the front page. Is it possible there's another type of USB 3.whatever port which looks like the common, mini/micro USB 2.0 port? The port I saw didn't have that notch, I'm sure, but if Fuji told my mate it's USB 3, and now Patrick's source is saying it's USB 3, I have to believe it really is USB 3 and maybe they just have a less common port for it? The only other thing I can think of is the T2 is meant to have USB 3, but the prototypes, for whatever reason, were made with USB 2. But I've never heard of Fuji making a prototype which is worse than the release model; if anything, they downgrade from the prototype, not upgrade.

In any case, still trying to see if I can have a bit more of a play with it some time soon. It seems like the leaks have gotten to the point where nobody should really care about keeping it secret—there's nothing left to leak, really—and the official announcement should be coming soon, anyway.

 

Also, just for the record, it seems that one of what I thought was some kind of audio port is actually a remote port. So it's headphones and remote, not headphones and mic. That's assuming Patrick's source is correct and more technologically clued-in than I am, which they probably are. This is why I'm a camera user and not an actual technology journalist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting that Patrick's source has now confirmed USB3.0 (or 3.1, or whatever), as he's posted on the front page. Is it possible there's another type of USB 3.whatever port which looks like the common, mini/micro USB 2.0 port? The port I saw didn't have that notch, I'm sure, but if Fuji told my mate it's USB 3, and now Patrick's source is saying it's USB 3, I have to believe it really is USB 3 and maybe they just have a less common port for it? The only other thing I can think of is the T2 is meant to have USB 3, but the prototypes, for whatever reason, were made with USB 2. But I've never heard of Fuji making a prototype which is worse than the release model; if anything, they downgrade from the prototype, not upgrade.

 

In any case, still trying to see if I can have a bit more of a play with it some time soon. It seems like the leaks have gotten to the point where nobody should really care about keeping it secret—there's nothing left to leak, really—and the official announcement should be coming soon, anyway.

 

Also, just for the record, it seems that one of what I thought was some kind of audio port is actually a remote port. So it's headphones and remote, not headphones and mic. That's assuming Patrick's source is correct and more technologically clued-in than I am, which they probably are. This is why I'm a camera user and not an actual technology journalist.

 

 

If it is the same micro USB port that has been used previously and is on many android phones then it is only USB 2. The wider micro USB port with the notch that you speak of is a USB 3 port, however there is a smaller port called USB-C that can be used for USB 3, it is also a reversible port and is used on devices like the new MacBook, Nexus 6P, OnePlus 3, etc. USB-C is also the port that will be replacing all other USB ports going forward even the full sized ones.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...