Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am a newbie and recently started using x-t1 a few months ago. Its the first camera i have owned thats not a cheap (<200) point and shoot. Need your suggestions in keeping costs down when it comes to filters -

 

 

I have a fuji F/2 35mm WR prime lens that accepts 43mm filters. I bought a polarizing filter so that i can capture blue skies (rather than a white out) while shooting outside in bright summer days.The problem is, 43 mm filters are hard to find. And probably won't they wont fit other fuji lenses that i will eventually buy. Next one i am looking for is the 27mm f/2. I don't want to have to buy a new filter for every lens i buy !

 

Someone mentioned that i should get a converter/ adapter which will allow me to buy 50mm filters (readily available) and use that on all my lenses. But a quick search on amazon didn't help me with that.

 

Could you advise about the existence and cost/ quality benefit of such converters ? 

What are they called converter/ adapter ?

What size filters would you recommend buying which can be used across most Fuji lenses ?

 

 

thanks for the help,

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are called step-up or step-down rings. This is what they look like: http://www.mini-max.sk/redukcie-a-redukcne-kruzky/redukcie-step-up. e. g. 43 to 49mm.

Thanks, that's very helpful.

Do you recommend using these step up, step down rings? Wondering if there is any drawback to using these instead of dedicated filters. Also, is there a way to find out the filter size required for different Fuji lenses ?

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are welcome. Look at the specs of the lenses (e.g. on the Fujifilm site) that you have and that you might like to buy in the future (or lenses from your previous cameras if you think you would use them adapted, for example if you have a macro lens that you like - you would not be able to use AF with adapted lenses but esp with a macro lens that would not matter anyway). Write down the diameters and you will see if you can save some cash with the step-up rings. Downsides ? Maybe some degree of inconvenience. A ring is cheap, so why not try it. Of course, you can use a bigger filter with a smaller lens but not vice versa obviously. Brgds

Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually buy a filter for the largest lens I own, or intend to own, then buy Step Up Rings to allow it to fit all my other lenses.  Most of mine are either 58 or 62.

 

I don't use lens hoods, except on my 55-200 when I'm shooting events outdoors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

... I have a fuji F/2 35mm WR prime lens that accepts 43mm filters. I bought a polarizing filter ... The problem is, 43 mm filters  ... probably won't ... fit other fuji lenses that i will eventually buy ... I don't want to have to buy a new filter for every lens i buy ! ...

My suggestion may not help, but here it is.  I suggest that considering the price of your new lenses, buying an additional filters for each lens is a relatively minor expense.  This is particularly true if you use "lens protector" filters to protect the front element.

 

Of course if you are a confirmed user of polarizing filters, the situation changes since these are among the most expensive filters to employ.  In that case buying the largest filter you will need and using step-down adapters may be viable.  However most if not all of the effects available with polarizers are also available in post-processing if you shoot "raw-plus-jpeg" routinely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
×
×
  • Create New...