Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I use the X-T4 and the longest lens I currently own is the 16-80mm kit lens but I want to branch out a bit and have a go at some sports and nature photography.  The main sport I want to have a go at is village cricket and from a nature perspective will most likely be birds.  I have been trying to read up on the various options open to me and I find myself getting tied up in knots with all the options and could use a little advice from anyone who has experience:

50-140mm  I like the sound of this one.  Premium quality.  F2.8 all the way and usable with the teleconverters.  I worry about the range for getting decent images in the centre of a cricket pitch, the cost if you include the TCs and the possible reduction of image quality when coupled with the x2 TC.  Would probably be looking at a used one.

70-300mm  The natural lens to fit in with my 16-80 kit lens.  Reports are good for the cost, size and image quality, but again I worry about the range without adding in a teleconverter.

100-400mm  A  decent lens by all accounts, but quite pricey and leaves me with a gap between 80-100mm focal length (probably not that much of an issue, to be fair).  Seems like it should be capable of taking the right images at range without resorting to TCs.

150-600mm  A beast.  Definitely going to be long enough, but possibly a little overkill.  Probably way over any sensible keen amateur's budget.

What are people's thoughts on the matter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been shooting Football and Lacrosse games of my grandsons for several years. I use the Fuji 100-400 zoom with great results. It has the real to bring players across the field right up close. The OIS works well for handheld, although I usually use a monopod since holding the camera and lens for a full game would be pretty hard. the focussing is fast, so I don't throw many shots away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Experience of 100-400 on X-T2 (sometimes with the 1.4 TC for birds) and people-  it's quite small and inconspicuous for the range. It works for a walk-around stealth camera almost anywhere. Focus, the newer bodies will do better for tracking and AF but I get an acceptable number of images. Excellent for the mid-range. Long range suffers as all lenses do from heat distortion, etc. On-body it fits into a quite small shoulder bag. Downside is the external movement which adds to dust accumulation inside, a reason not to buy used.

The 100-600, like the white prime 200 an attention getter. Like the 50-140 it's an internal movement zoom, an advantage. I find the 50-140 can be useful for the mid-range with or without TC since the quality is so high that extensive cropping mimics tele-zoom.

Both the 100-400 and the 100-600 in the overall scheme of photography are remarkably small and inexpensive. You don't need the 600 for sports. The 100-400 is currently on sale everywhere in a Fuji promotion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

With my full frame Canon R5 I need at least 400mm for cricket, that’s with an R5 which has a 45Mp sensor so room for cropping, sometimes I add the 1.4tc to the 400mm/2.8. The Fuji 70-300 would work ok for you on smaller grounds which are typical for village cricket. The 100-400 would be ideal, not only for reach but also better ability to blur out the background at 400mm. Also you will probably want to use a monopod as cricket matches are lengthy affairs, there is no tripod foot option for the 70-300.

For small birds the 70-300 is barely long enough without a teleconverter but obviously an excellent choice if you like to walk around.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Example: I am using a custom recipe, and I then use the film simulation dial to select a simulation. Are values from the custom recipe carried over, such as highlights, shadow, and white balance etc.? After studying the articles in Fuji X Weekly, this appears to be the case If you set a recipe on one of the C slots its settings will be applied to all the film simulations on the dial. The workaround is to use your 'standard' recipe at C1.   Please clarify this for me . I would have thought the film simulation dial would have no input from other camera settings.   Thank you - Very Confuded!
    • Is this on the X-T30 II? Sounds like you have HDR selected in the shooting menu. The other alternative when you see the "storing" message is that the Clarity setting is non-zero but that doesn't cause multiple clicks.
    • My XS10 came with a Capture One license but my PC at the time would barely run it so I stuck with my ancient version of Picasa.  Bought a new PC and my old Capture One has been deprecated and fuji site only talks about a 3 month trial.  Is there a work around or should I be looking for something else?
    • On aperture priority and single shot, camera clicks twice after one shot and then takes several seconds showing "storing" message.  This is a new camera and did not do this at first.  Does not do this on auto.
    • I have the Fuji 80 mm macro and really like it. It's very sharp and I use it for macro but also for general photography. If you find yourself zoomed to 55, this may land in the right spot. Also, this lens is very good with magnification distortion (pincushion or barrel), which is probably important if you're doing product photography and the product has straight lines. It is autofocus. I hear you don't prioritize that, but there's something else you gain when you have autofocus. You can combine multiple photos taken at slightly different focus distances, using stacking software, and autofocus lets the camera automate the process of taking all these, using focus bracketing. It even calculates how much the focus should change between these exposures. This lens, new, is above your stated budget. Maybe you can find it used? In any case, options are always nice to have, and others may like this option too. So, just a thought. One more thing: I've never used the Laowa macro you mention, but I do have their circular fisheye. I love circular fisheyes, and also have two other brands, and comparing them I find the Laowa is considerably better than the other two. That's a vote for Laowa.
×
×
  • Create New...