Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am trying to decide which of the two kit zooms to get with the X-T10, the premium 16-55mm or the less expensive and smaller 18-55mm. According the the specs, the 16-55mm is twice as heavy as the 18-55mm: with the small body of the X-T10, I wonder if the larger lens would over balance the camera.

 

I'm not too worried about the 18-55mm being a stop slower on the long end, nor its lack of weather resistance; but has anyone compared the image quality (and for that matter, the build quality) of these two lenses?

 

Thanks very much.  

Rodger Kingston

Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been comparison made already

 

http://www.fujivsfuji.com/16-55mm-f2pt8-vs-18-55mm-f2pt8-4-vs-18-135mm-f3pt5-5pt6/

 

If one is not absolutely in need of the minor advantages of the more expensive and heavier zoom one shouldn’t discard the humble 18-55mm. 

 

This lens is offered at a pittance in kit form with many X cameras and can be even cheaper if bought secondhand because there are tons of them out there for sale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you REALLY need that extra stop of light and some slight sharpness at the edges, I would pick the 18-55 over the 16-55.

 

I can live with that stop less of light at the far end but having to carry extra weight can be really annoying really fast. Plus I am super spoiled by the OIS from my 18-135 and I would hate to lose that on "standard zoom range" lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't think you need the extra stop of light, I'd go with the 18-55. I'm sure the 16-55 is better in some ways, but the 18-55 has impressed me. Normally kit lenses are the first thing I sell or sit on the shelf. I think the 18-55mm beats the 24-105mm F/4L that came with my Canon. I like the smallness and lightness of the Fuji cameras and lenses. The 16-55 goes against that some but serves its purpose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

16-55 is mainly for pros who need WR and use tripods for stability. It is noticeably bigger, heavier, and no OIS. It's also more $. It is not that much better if u get a still shot but the cons outweigh the pros.

 

You will do much better with the 18-55 and primes. 18-55 will be more usable on the small grip xt10. And F1.2-1.4 primes will give you the true bokeh that you need.  OIS will help you get sharper shots without tripods.

 

A grip enlarger/extender will help on the XT10 regardless of which zoom u get.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...