Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi there,

I do a lot of HDR panoramas. What I try to accomplish is to get stars on street lights on cityscapes. But whenever I try to go for a higher F-Stop I get diffraction around to city lights. Does anyone of you have some experience?

X-E1 with 14mm

Thanks  

Just open aperture one step from minimum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will depend on the style of aperature blade, and the aperature.   The smaller the aperature, the more defined stars you'll get.  The sharper the aperature blades, the more defined stars you'll get.   It has little to do with the shutter speed, (although they'll lengthen a tiny bit with a longer shutter, and generally you'll need a longer shutter to accodomate a night shot with an f/11 - 22 shot).

 

the 14, for instance, has VERY rounded blades, so you'll have a hard time getting much starlike from it. 

 

The 10-24 is a bit better at it.  the 18-55 also. 

 

The good news is that a large number of older, cheap lenses tend to have sharp blades.  If you find somehting with an odd number of blades, you'll get double the number of bursts as you do blades. If you have an even number, it's the same.  (so, 4 bladed aperatures have 4 lines. 5 have 10 lines, 6 have 6 lines, 7 have 14 lines, etc).

 

Rokinon/Samyand 12 is decent, voigtlander's 15/3,5 is great, and there are many many others.   Bokeh on these won't be as pleasing wider, because of the sharper blades.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Do you find the diffraction is linked to exposure length - does under exposing help minimize it? 

 

For reference regarding stars, here's f16 on a XF 23mm on an X-T10

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...