Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello, I am new here and i have a question about banding, or some call it posterisation.
I was taking some pictures from a sunrise with fog. I have a new X-T2 en also a fuji X-T1 and i also created a time laps with an Olympus OMD-EM1.
I was not pleased to see som banding on my photo's from the Fuji camera's .  The Olympus is older and had a 16 Megap. Sensor as i believe, and the Olypus is the one with the least of banding issues.

How can i avoid the banding isues ? I know fog and sunrise is a difficult light combo.
I know the best file is the RAW file to avoid banding, but also here it is present.
The Fuji X-T2 had 400 ISO  and i had a Samyang 12mm on it with f8.
 

I had some hope this ( the banding effect ) was not an isue on the X-T2 anymore.

I have some pictures you can see at the folowing link:  https://teunijff.stackstorage.com/s/AG1MfPitG9bm8u3  ( Stack is a cloud service )

The file called "extreme is JPEG from the X-T2 and i did have some shifting with the mid-tones so that you can see the banding more specifick.

The file called OM 1 is a flie shot with the Olympus OMD-EM1 MK1, and here is some minor banding.
But the X-T1 and the X-T2 have some more banding. I tought a larger sensor should have lesser banding ? 

There are some Jpeg's and also some RAW ( RAF ) files.

 

Sory for my bad english, i live in the Netherlands and English is not my native language.
I also have a problem with the LCD and EVF, there some flickering an light flashing as i focus on a subject. And also when i take a picture, afterwards you see a bright flashing after te photo is taken on the LCD and EVF.
It does not have an effect on the photo's also. And strange thing is, as i use the Samyang 12 mm on the body, the flashing does not ocure
I read some of you had also this problem, is it something what a firmware could heal this anoing isue ?

I hope some of you can advise me. Do i have to return my Fuji X-T2 ?
The banding isue is for me a serious problem, as i take many pictures in this condition of light. ( sunrise's )

 

Thanks for reading and i hope someone can help !

 

Greetings Teun IJff

Edited by Teun ijff
Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see banding in the Milandro's link, but not in the samples provided by Teon ijff. Yes, there are definite horizontal color zones in those landscapes, but isn't that specific distribution of natural light?...

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP is talking of yet something else, it is called color banding.

 

We’ve spoken more often about it.

 

 


that is nothing but normal in digital photography and hardly a feature of Fuji cameras.

 

It's called color banding.

 

There are many resources on line which talk about it and offer workarounds but some of it is built in the digital technique itself. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colour_banding

 

https://fstoppers.com/post-production/learn-how-fix-color-banding-using-just-one-simple-tool-7946

 

more on it...

 

http://www.hdrshooter.com/2015/01/09/dealing-with-color-banding/

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks terribl - and is quite common with this type of pictures. I do not know how to avoid it - aother than wait for another camerra to arrive. - Sometimes I add blur which helps a little - bot im not sattisfied. Your best bet is to shoot RAF and try to nail it, or use bracketing - Thats what I do - but even so - sometimes u cant avoid it: ie it depends on what type of monitor you display your images.

Edited by Torturro
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thans Milandro for the answer.

Fog en sunrise seks to be aan difficult problem :(

 

IT is even showing on the RAF files.

I wil the next time bracketing index.

My iPad pro is showing index les color banding.

But the monitor i use is a good monitor from Dell the 2711.

 

Is banding also a sensor isue ? The MFT sensor in the OMD - EM1 have lesser banding isue then the new X-T2 sensor.

 

I hate the banding, iT is ruining my photo with fog and sunrise’s.

In the LCD from the fuji don’t show the color banding, but i can not rely on it and when i am at home, on different monitors it rhen shows.

 

Accept from bracketing, are there other things i can do to avoid this color banding isue ?

Thans al the members for the Answers !!

 

Greetings Teun Ijff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...