Jump to content

My Lightroom is unbearably slow with XPro2 files


Recommended Posts

Everyone knows that loading RAF files into lightroom takes a long time, and while it sucks, that's not my problem. Once everything is loaded up, and I'm trying to browse/edit my photos, it's like moving through molasses. Even moving to the next photo in the library module can take two or three seconds. 

 

Transitioning from Library to Develop module takes around 10-15 seconds before it's usable.

 

After adjusting the exposure slider, there is around a two second delay before the adjustment appears on the screen. More intensive sliders take longer. I make an adjustment, and I have to wait and see if it looks good, and then go back and re-adjust, because it won't happen live.

 

Moving to the next photo in the develop module take five or more seconds.

 

I'm using a Windows 10 laptop with an i7 processor, 32 gigs of ram, and a fast SSD with tons of free space on it. I haven't made any major changes to the performance settings in Preferences.

 

I guess my main question is, what are the chances that I'm doing something wrong with my settings, or my library? It seems impossible to me that it's just this bad for everyone. Trying to intensively edit 30 or more photos leaves me with a sense of dread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

you don't say which version of Lightroom you're using, but the following solution should work anyway.

 

A bit of tech background: I still use an iMac from mid 2011 with the DIY addition of an SSD and 24Gb of Ram. And I shoot with an X-T10, a Sony A7r (36Mp) and with medium format, on film that once scanned is around 100Mp per frame.

 

The only time I experienced what you describe I was this close to buy a new computer, but then I noticed that with the same files Photoshop was still super fast, so it had to be something Lightroom-related.

 

And in the end it was: apparently, Lightroom has a long term bug. If you happen to have too many developing presets it starts rendering previews in background for every image you're browsing with every preset you have installed, so it slows down to a crawl.

 

Keeping only the presets I use more often completely solved the problem for me.

 

If instead you happen to be still be using a 6.* version, you might want to read this post of mine:

 

http://www.addicted2light.com/2015/10/19/how-to-solve-lightroom-6-2-and-6-2-1-slow-downs/

 

And for some other possible solution found on various forums read the first half of this post:

 

http://www.addicted2light.com/2015/01/25/how-to-cure-lightroom-5-slow-down/

 

Good luck!

 

And btw, Adobe should really redesign the engine of Lightroom if they still want money for it...otherwise even if it'll be a major pain I'll change software.

Edited by addicted2light
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

you don't say which version of Lightroom you're using, but the following solution should work anyway.

 

A bit of tech background: I still use an iMac from mid 2011 with the DIY addition of an SSD and 24Gb of Ram. And I shoot with an X-T10, a Sony A7r (36Mp) and with medium format, on film that once scanned is around 100Mp per frame.

 

The only time I experienced what you describe I was this close to buy a new computer, but then I noticed that with the same files Photoshop was still super fast, so it had to be something Lightroom-related.

 

And in the end it was: apparently, Lightroom has a long term bug. If you happen to have too many developing presets it starts rendering previews in background for every image you're browsing with every preset you have installed, so it slows down to a crawl.

 

Keeping only the presets I use more often completely solved the problem for me.

 

If instead you happen to be still be using a 6.* version, you might want to read this post of mine:

 

http://www.addicted2light.com/2015/10/19/how-to-solve-lightroom-6-2-and-6-2-1-slow-downs/

 

And for some other possible solution found on various forums read the first half of this post:

 

http://www.addicted2light.com/2015/01/25/how-to-cure-lightroom-5-slow-down/

 

Good luck!

 

And btw, Adobe should really redesign the engine of Lightroom if they still want money for it...otherwise even if it'll be a major pain I'll change software.

 

I'm using the most updated version of CC.

 

I'll try paring down my presets. I have a bunch of the VSCO presets so hopefully that will help. Thanks for the tips. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're welcome, let us know if you manage to solve the problem!

 

Deleting a great deal of my presets seems to have had an effect. It's still not nearly instant like I would hope it would be with my hardware setup, but it's certainly more tolerable. Thanks for the tip. You've saved me quite a bit of frustration. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • It is really easy to find out if the wifi is on. Your computer or tablet or cell phone will have a network settings dealing with wifi, bluetooth, ethernet or “other”. Open that up and go into the section for wifi, and take note of which networks are listed. Turn on the camera and keep watching the list of networks. If your camera’s wifi is turned on, a new network should suddenly show up in your computer/tablet/phone’s network listings. Now go into the camera’s menus and start a wireless connection (the x-app or camera remote app can help you with this). You should see a network show up now. It is not hidden because it has to be visible so that your computer/tablet/phone can join the camera’s network to transfer images. Turn the camera off and that network should disappear. Turn the camera back on and see what happens.
    • Sweet Creek Falls, Oregon. X-H1, Viltrox 13mm F1.4, Acros.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • I think my Fuji 150-600 F8 is a brilliant wildlife lens in terms of sharpness, portability and value but the small aperture does cause issues at the start and end of the day - even pushing the ISO as far as I dare, I can see shutter speed down to 1/25s - stabilisation isn't an issue but asking a deer to stand still for that is too much! In the same situation, an F4 would give 1/100s so the difference to the success rate would be phenomenal... and that's without the other improvements like shallower depth of field. I also find that the Fuji's subject detect AF gets pretty iffy in low light - I keep updating to the latest firmware but it doesn't seem to get any better. I was originally looking at the Nikon 500mm F4 E but good examples secondhand are still reasonably expensive but like-for-like Sigma lenses are around half the price. Reviews I have read suggest that they are as good optically, AF performance and IS-wise but you gain a few hundred grams of weight (but less than the older Nikon model). For a couple of grand, I can live with that. Does anyone have any experience mounting one on an XH2S? What about with the 1.4 teleconverter? It feels like that is pushing it anyway - hefty lens + TC + Fringer all sounds a bit...wobbly? It is on the Fringer approved list but I am wary about AF speed in particular. I had also considered looking for a used Nikon 400mm F2.8, which would be even faster (and heavier) and could couple with a TC to give 560mm F4 but again, it is that lens+TC+Fringer combination that worries me as being just too many links in the chain. Of course, what I really want is a native Fuji prime but that doesn't seem to be on the horizon - and if you look at what Nikon and Sony are doing, if Fuji do ever bring out a 500mm prime, it will probably be a small, light and cheapish F5.6, which is only 2/3 stop better than my zoom at the same focal length. Any thoughts anyone?
    • The Amazon link is an annoying feature of this forum - its automatic and is applied to every post for advertising purposes. My question was - how do you know the camera wi-fi is on and requires turning off? I would have thought this would just use up the battery for no purpose if you aren't specifically using a function that requires wi-fi.
    • I've made a point to push Angelbird memory products as they are the best performance cards you can get, The sustained write speed is important.
×
×
  • Create New...