Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone!

Sent in my XT1 for repair last week and never heard back from them. I checked the tracking number which confirmed it was delivered Wednesday the 4th so I decided to call them yesterday morning (Monday the 9th) to follow up.

 

Anyway, the issue is that with any lens attached, I'd get F0 and no auto-focus. Fuji thinks it's the entire "mount assembly" and have quoted me $293. This feels a little high for me but am curious if anyone else has had experience with them and if you all have any suggestions as far as alternative repair shops etc. I've had the camera for over a year so there's no warranty.

Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Got my body back (finally)... repair total was in fact $293 for a faulty main board. The grips were replaced as was the connector's cover door. I'm pretty happy with the work but feel $293 is a little high. Anyway, just thought I'd update the post.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think $293 is fair for a whole new board and that rubber stuff, if the camera was already out of warranty.
After my latest longer photography trip I've finally decided to send my camera to Fujifilm, too. I also want new rubber parts, a sensor cleaning and I've told them about the bigger lenses losing electronic contact sometimes when zooming. I'm curious what my bill will look like. :P Perhaps I'll get the 'mount assembly' you were promised.

Edited by quincy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering that almost everything on the camera connects to the board, it's a reasonable price for such a critical component.

 

A colleague broke his D800 shutter recently and it could end up costing that much to replace it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just to conclude:

My camera came back today. The log says:

"parts repaired:
- lens mount
- casing

parts replaced:
- grips"

The lens mount is now nice and firm, even the formerly very loose sitting Samyang 12/2 clicks in place with a satisfying 'clonk' and has only minimum rotational play. My XF 27 needs gentle force to be mounted and sits absolutely tight. Very nice improvement.
I don't know what they had to repair on the casing, but I think I'm happy they did it, whatever it was.
All the rubber parts have been exchanged, except for one small piece on the upper left side. The new door now closes tight and does not bulge. The new rubber parts are a lot harder and have a rougher surface than the old ones. I can compare that directly, since they left this one piece alone. Feels more like plastic now, the old one feels like rubber, but of course it might just have aged.

So, in total I paid... nothing. It seems that I, somehow, bought an extended 2-year no-questions-asked-warranty with my camera (demo sample). Lucky me. Oh, and the camera already had the newest firmware installed when it came back!

All in all, I have to say that Fujifilm's customer service left me with a very positive experience, and I think even if I would have had to pay for it (which I expected), I'd be happy now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting what you say about the rubber. The X-T2 has that harder, rougher rubber/plastic, too. Makes me think that's the only type of covering they stock now; perhaps every Fuji camera made or repaired from now on will have that new covering. I like it, personally. More grippy, doesn't feel a cheap.

As for the price, well, yeah. That's about what significant camera repairs cost. I've had a couple of repairs (non-Fuji) which have gone into four figures. But's that's just the nature of camera bodies. They're incredibly expensive to make, and they make very little profit. When you have to have a lot repaired, it's not unusual to end up paying half what a new body is worth, and I've heard of a few instances where the manufacturer has just outright replaced the body because it can be cheaper to do that than repair a broken one, by the itme you factor in the man hours on top of the parts cost.

 

This is why I detest photographers who throw their gear around with the "it's just a tool" mentality. Tool or not, it represents a significant amount of money. No point risking damaging it if you can easily avoid doing so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I use to shoot Nikon (before my change to the Fuji line-up) I had 3 bodies repaired and one lens 'checked and cleaned'.  They pretty much wouldn't touch the bodies for less than $300. The lens 'tune-up' ran me $150.  I think your cost is in line with the work done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...