Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So for starters I just finally made the move from Nikon over to a complete Fuji setup.

 

Hold your applause please.

 

:D

 

So I have pretty much all the main lenses that Fuji makes (16, 23, 27, 35, 56, 90, 50-140 and now the new 100-400).  

 

I own an X-T1 and X100T and have been starting to as I call it "Dial it in" using the X-T1 more often.  

 

I have taken plenty of photos with both cameras before and things have been coming out pretty well...

 

Not this last week though...

 

As you can see I have barely moved the camera or the lens and it looks like I am getting some horrible rolling shutter issues or something else.

 

I have tweaked some of the settings to try and compensate for this but it's happening all the time now.

 

I thought it was the 100-400 doing this but I'm finding out it's on other lenses also...I will have to show in another post as I don't have enough space to upload here.

 

BTW the order of photos isn't how you see them.

 

The first photo should be the 3rd in the sequence.

 

I haven't drastically changed any of the settings in the camera but this has started to become a complete across the board issue?

 

Where should I start to find out what is going on?

 

Czech

 

 

 

 

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by czechappleguy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a follow up question?

 

Does it become amplified if OIS is turned on also at higher speeds?

 

:unsure:

 

Czech

 

OIS doesn't affect it only your own body movement as your take the picture while on Electronic shutter.

 

Stay still and it will be a lot less pronounced or keep using the mechanical shutter, but do take note that your speed will be capped at 1/4000 of a sec.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why using electronic shutter unless it is absolutely necessary?

 

it has its own characteristics and some other advantages than being silent but the reason why it was offered as an option, nevertheless to be used only when necessary.

 

Aside the creation of distorted images,  other things like “ banding” are also the product of the use of this type of shutter when used with  a light source, such as fluorescent light, which is not a continuous one.

 

This article talks od electronic shutters and their quirks. Which are a great many more than the one observed above.

 

http://m43photo.blogspot.nl/2013/03/gh3-electronic-shutter.html

 

I have tried it for a while and decided that I am going to use it only for extra fast shutter speeds, documents, slides or paintings reproduction shots and of course theater or shooting during audio or video recording.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So after I banged my head against the wall acouple dozen times...

 

:D

 

I went back into the "New features Guide" PDF file because I remembered what it had said and I'm going...Where did I read about the ES?

 

Well sure enough on page EN-4 under the heading "Shutter Type Selection".

 

You get this paragraph:

 

"Distortion may be visible in shots of moving subjects, while banding and fog may occur in shots taken under fluorescent lights or other flickering or erratic illumination. When taking pictures with the shutter muted, respect your subjects’ image rights and right to privacy."

 

Does anyone have any ibuprofen I can borrow for my headache????

 

Sheesh...

 

Czech

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...