Jump to content

Epson Begins Volume Production of High-Resolution Ultimicron Panel for Electronic Viewfinders


Recommended Posts

Good news for the X-Pro2 / X-T2 ?

 

EPSON Press Release

 

Most likely the one that is currently used in the Leica SL.

 

- TOKYO, Japan, December 9, 2015 -

- New panel realizes world’s highest resolution for volume-produced panels for EVFs -
 

151209_info.jpg

 

Seiko Epson Corporation (TSE: 6724, "Epson") today announced that it has recently begun shipping its latest high-resolution Ultimicron panels for electronic viewfinders (EVF). The new panels boast the highest resolution among volume-produced products for digital camera EVFs*

 

Epson has continued to refine the performance of its Ultimicron panels with the aim of achieving the natural and beautiful images required by quality EVFs. Measuring 0.66 inches diagonally, the new Ultimicron boasts resolution of 4.41-million dots (SXGA+ (1400 x RGB x 1050)) - approximately double the resolution of conventional XGA products - and provides camera manufacturers with greater optical design flexibility, for example lens selection or magnification ratio. By expanding the color gamut by about 30% compared with existing products, Epson has allowed users to adjust the screen to their preferred color. These specifications translate into a natural viewfinder that precisely meets the needs serious camera users.
 

Specifications and other information

Name: L3FJ63800C

LCD type: TN mode, organic alignment layer
Color display system: Color filter (RGB stripe)
Effective pixels: 1400 x RGB x 1050 (SXGA+)
Panel size (diagonal): 0.66 inch (1.65 cm)
Pixel pitch: 9.6 μm (3.2 x RGB) x 9.6 μm
Color space: 98% of sRGB
Backlight: Yes
Surface luminance: 650 cd/m2
Displayable colors: Approx. 16.77 million colors

 

* The X-T1 currently uses a 1024 x 768 pixel display, (times 3 for RGB) equals 2.36M dots.

Edited by Maurice
Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope I remember right, but isn't the X-T1 panel 0.5"? This would make the new one 30% bigger.

I could understand, that this would be problematic with the X-E3 or even X-Pro2.

 

But it's very likely we are looking at the panel of the X-T2 viewfinder here! 

 

 

If I remember right, this new panel should be capable of 120fps. With a new, fast read out sensor this could eliminate viewfinder lag and blackout.

Those things (together with for example a second SD card slot or an Joystick for AF point selection) are much more important to me than ISO128000 and other stuff.  (Image quality is quite good already, ease of use is more important) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm... Still think it's a bit late, usually by this time of camera manufacturing the development is already done and they are preparing the factories for production and getting all the materials.

 

It would be rather costly to suddenly change to another component since all the contracts have been signed and agreements are already in place.

 

Maybe X-T2 ? Or another following model but we are a bit too close of X-Pro2 announcement to have changes applied to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...