Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've not used my X-t3 for a while, haven't changed any settings since I last used it & it was working fine. But now everything through the viewfinder & the images it takes are massively under-exposed & dark, in a weird, grey-ish kind of way. Please see image attached; it's hard to capture in a photo, but this was a well lit setting, with the camera on: Shutter 125, Aperture 5.6, ISO 400. The image is way too dark (nb it's not blue like in the photo, just really under-exposed). I'm thinking of doing a factory reset but can't find how to do this. 

Help! 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Olaf W. said:

Is the resulting image dark, too, or is it just dark in the display?

Thanks - no, in fact I just tried to do a factory reset (not sure if it worked though, as my own settings seemed to still be there) & now the images look ok in the viewfinder but the resulting images are massively too dark. I can't work out how to change the exposure settings. I've tried to take photos showing the viewfinder window before taking the photo & the playback of the image taken, but the second image is so dark the screen is like a mirror, but I think you can see the difference! The camera settings are on the screen. I would expect it to be maybe a little dark at 7.1, but not this dark. Plus I thought the whole thing with mirrorless cameras is what you see on the screen should be the same as the shot you take! 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Alami1906
Link to post
Share on other sites

There are different display modes, so the display doen‘t necessarily show the resulting image during shooting (the manual describes the different modes). Watch the exposure indicator to get the correct exposure. F7.1 will not give enough brightness under normal light conditions inside. Open the aperture to the max for testing and/or dial up the ISO value.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Olaf W. said:

There are different display modes, so the display doen‘t necessarily show the resulting image during shooting (the manual describes the different modes). Watch the exposure indicator to get the correct exposure. F7.1 will not give enough brightness under normal light conditions inside. Open the aperture to the max for testing and/or dial up the ISO value.

Thanks @Olaf W. - Opening the aperture did help to improve it, but then I have to massively increase the iso - with the grain that results - as otherwise the shutter speed becomes really slow. I've been trying to fix this while on a train sitting by a massive window, & the light levels inside aren't very different to outside, so I guess I'm puzzled why this camera is incapable of dealing with the indoor light - it's mostly sunlight coming in from outside! Maybe I'm too used to DSLRs that are fine taking indoor photos, but this wasn't exactly a crappy cheap camera!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Olaf W. said:

Try some outdoor shoots to narrow down the problem. 

Thanks @Olaf W.- I did try some out of the train window & they were much better than the indoor shots. But as I said above, it's weird because the inside of the train was being lit by the light from the window, so the lighting was almost the same!

I will try some more tomorrow; too tired now. Thanks so much for your help! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought for you. Your images look like you are in manual mode, if so the camera isn’t under exposing, you are.
 

My suggestion would be to go into Auto Aperture (iso to A and shutter speed to A, aperture to something neutral like 5.6). I would also select matrix metering.  Once setup like this, see what iso and shutter speed the camera selects for what it believes is the proper exposure. You can then adjust your aperture and observe the offset to iso and shutter speed the camera makes.
 

To understand how your camera is behaving you will want to spend a minute with the manual reading up on Auto ISO. There are also numerous resources online that will explain how that function works. Once you understand how Auto ISO works than you can dial in your preferences to influence how it adjusts.

From here the natural follow up is to then change metering methods (Fuji calls it photometry) and also mess around with the exposure compensation dial and see how they influence the exposure.

Spend a half hour or so messing with these items and you will have a pretty good baseline of how to set your camera for a proper exposure.

 

Hope that helps,

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

I re-read your Orig post and it may be that your display is showing you the wide open aperture so it will be brighter than the shot. Indoors it will be much darker (it will surprise you how much) your eyes adjust but the camera won't.  Try a tripod (or table top) and open your aperture and reduce your shutter speed w/ ISO Auto (check the meter for proper exposure) to get the shot. then go outside and do the same to see the difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks @dwardand @dta116 ; Thanks so much for the advice; I think you're right that it may be the settings & not a fault. I will try all of this; right now I'm occupied on a time-consuming shoot over several days with my Nikon D750; I took the Fuji along as a back-up but haven't used it for so long I've forgotten a lot of the settings!

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Alami1906 said:

but haven't used it for so long I've forgotten a lot of the settings!

Yeah, I too am a Nikon user but there is no better camera for street photography than the x-E3 and I too forget where things are and it just goes to show you that practice is everything in photography.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...