Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I purchased my XT2 in August 2017 and have devoured the manual . I also watch a lot of Youtube.

Almost every reference on Youtube about Boost Mode says  its only available with the booster grip.  The manual does not state this.

I select it in the camera, and I notice the improvement in the refresh rate in the  viewfinder , faster focusing and faster burst.

Am I hallucinating? Or is it actually enabled without the battery grip?  ( as part of a firmware upgrade)

My shooting style rarely requires the additional AF Speed but I use it primarily for the finder refresh rate.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recall that the grip enhances some of the boost mode features, maybe the highest of frame rates on continuous high (CH) goes up from 8 to 11 FPS. Otherwise without the grip you still get the faster AF and as you noticed the higher EVF refresh rate.   

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are not hallucinating - the Boost Mode is available with or without the Booster Grip. If you go to page 229 of the X-T2 User Guide v1.0 or page 238 of the User Guide v2.1 you'll see a brief mention of it there. Without a grip, “Boost” mode is activated by the down arrow Fn button. Some people move this to the “Fn” button on the top of the camera as that arrow key offers more “prime” Fn button real estate for their usage. Using Boost, AF performance changes from Normal to Fast and EVF display quality from Normal to High with the refresh rate changing from 60fps to 100fps. 

Using the VPB-XT2 Vertical Power Booster Grip, you can switch the grip’s performance selector to “Boost”, which will literally boost the maximum Continuous High frame rate from 8fps, to 11fps, whilst simultaneously reducing the release lag from 50ms to 45ms! But the payback is a consequent reduction in battery life - from 340 farmers using LCD to 260 and from 330 frames using the EVF down to 200. One interesting aspect is that with all batteries on board, and the Boost switch in Normal Mode, power is drawn first from the left VPB battery, then the right, before drawing down on the camera battery. If Boost mode is activated, power is drawn from all batteries at once, providing sufficient current for the higher power demand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the input.

It does surprise me that many of the "so called" expert reviewers seem to have it wrong. 

Coming from film, old school, I rarely shoot in burst so the reduced burst amount is not a big issue . But I appreciate the info on power consumption.

Battery life is really the only weakness of this series, but the solution is to carry more batteries, or the grip if you don't mind the extra bulk.  Not rocket science.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I really like the image quality, size, and weight of my mark II. I never owned the mark I so I can’t help with comparison though it is highly regarded as a great lens.  I don’t use mine for video but I will say it doesn’t have the smoothest zoom, which seems to be common complaint for the mark II.  For photos it doesn’t bother me but I would imagine would be an issue if zooming while recording video. 
    • Good day fellow Fuji people   I wanted to ask your opinion on the subject of the 16-55mm Mark I vs Mark II. I want to use it mainly for my concert photography where I currently use my 50-140mm and a second camera with a prime lense. I would like to use a second good quality zoom lens thats why I became interested in the 16-55mm. My question is for anyone having experience with both wether the new one (which looks very promising but pricey) or the older one (much heavier but seems to deliver on optical quality and I could get that used for roughly half the price of the new one)?  From what I could find online I guess in terms of pure image quality both are going to deliver. So then it would come down to usability, ease of use, maybe video ability, and longevity etc.  I use my Fuji X-H2 and Fuji X-S20 currently. If anyone has thoughts I would be highly appreciative. Thank you in advance,   Best regards from Switzerland, Mischa 
    • It'd be a bit of a rigmarole, but maybe enable the function buttons on the lens, focus on infinity (distant tower/tree/mountain/etc), then set that as a focus preset. Use a function button to return to that infinity focus when you have a bird against a clear sky. I have the same problem with my XF 150-600, so far I just put up with it, or zoom out enough to find and focus on the bird, or focus on a distant treetop etc.
    • I've wondered the same thing. Years ago I learned that some very long lenses can focus slightly past infinity, for the reasons that temperature and other variables can move the mechanical location of infinity focus around a little bit, and IIRC using IR film can require focusing out further than the position that's best for visible light. I've focused on birds on distant towers, and the autofocus worked for that. Still, I'll be watching this thread for further developments.
    • I was hoping to get some info on how to infinity focus the xf 500mm.  I’m trying to focus on distant birds in the sky.  Is there an infinity mark on the lenses? If so, I can’t find it. If there’s not one, how would one work around this?
×
×
  • Create New...