Jump to content

Recommended Posts

With most Fuji WR lenses there's a certain 'roughness' in the zoom and focus rings. I've been told -by a camera repair expert- this has to do with the way how Fuji seals the rings with slightly oversized plastic rings. That gives a feeling like it is insufficiently 'lubricated'. Some people describe it like there's fine-grained sand in the lens. It is suppose to get less over time with more use and there's a sample variation between lenses even of the same type. Having said that, I don't experience this with weather sealed lenses of the other brands I use (Nikon and Leica). The aforementioned repair man told me that this is due to the quality of the sealing ring. A replacement ring for a Nikkor S lens costs about 4x as much as that of a comparable Fuji WR lens... (for X-mount that is, not for G-mount).

Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, rmuscio said:

I have this lens and I'm not quite sure what you mean by roughness. My zoom ring is smooth through out the range, but it is ever so slightly, almost imperceptibly, tougher to turn as you get into the 24mm range. 

What I'm experiencing is similar to what you describe, except that the spot where it gets tougher to turn (near 24mm) also feels like it's got a rough spot in it, but like you say it's nearly imperceptible. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Herco said:

With most Fuji WR lenses there's a certain 'roughness' in the zoom and focus rings. I've been told -by a camera repair expert- this has to do with the way how Fuji seals the rings with slightly oversized plastic rings. That gives a feeling like it is insufficiently 'lubricated'. Some people describe it like there's fine-grained sand in the lens. It is suppose to get less over time with more use and there's a sample variation between lenses even of the same type. Having said that, I don't experience this with weather sealed lenses of the other brands I use (Nikon and Leica). The aforementioned repair man told me that this is due to the quality of the sealing ring. A replacement ring for a Nikkor S lens costs about 4x as much as that of a comparable Fuji WR lens... (for X-mount that is, not for G-mount).

Ah, this is very helpful. I pulled my 16-55mm out and while it does feel a bit smoother, it also exhibits the same roughness in one spot of its range, similar to the characteristic of the 10-24mm. Thanks for your reply!

Edited by deepsun
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • (Open Thread) Not a winter landscape, but still cold.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
    • agreed on the upload but based on the location and number it sounds exactly like the storage slot 1 status icon
    • All three of my bodies (X-E2, X-T4, GFX100S II) have shoot without lenses enabled and they have all had it set since I bought them.  No harm in it at all. Just remember to set the focal length when you fit a manual lens with no electronics otherwise the IBIS (if you have it) goes nuts. I regularly use vintage film lenses from Minolta, Zeiss, Mamiya, Rollei and others on my X mounts along with more modern manual focus stuff from TTArtisans. I also use Nikon AF-S lenses with a Fringer so the world is your oyster! Vintage lenses can be an absolute bargain too - For example the Zeiss 135 f/35 in M42 is as cheap as chips and very sharp as is the excellent Minolta 35-70 Macro (which is also rebadged Leica). 
    • I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • Hy there When Im using the fan001 on the XH2s and I flip the LCD Screen vertically by 180 degrees then the image flips vertically, what is good but it also flips horizontally. The clean feed on HDMI is not flipping horizontally but its also flipping if the HDMI output info display is on. When I unmount the fan then the image flips only vertically. My firmware is updated to the latest version. Any ideas if there is a fix for that?
×
×
  • Create New...