Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have a Fuji xt30 with the xf 18-55 kit lens. The lens has a variable aperture, but if you choose f-stop smaller than 4.5, the aperture is constant throughout all focal lengths! How come? Does the aperture change while zooming even if it shows the same f-stop?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not quite sure what you mean.

The maximum shutter changes based on the focal length so if you set a manual aperture of f/2.8 at 18mm, say - then aperture would change as you zoom out.

Any manual aperture smaller than f4 will remain the same through the zoom range unless you change it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Greybeard said:

Not quite sure what you mean.

The maximum shutter changes based on the focal length so if you set a manual aperture of f/2.8 at 18mm, say - then aperture would change as you zoom out.

Any manual aperture smaller than f4 will remain the same through the zoom range unless you change it.

Exactly....isn’t it strange that the aperture (the opening of the lens) remains the same when you zoom in.? Shouldn’t the aperture change the same way it does at f 2.8 at 18 mm  when you zoom?

Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Elmerviking said:

Exactly....isn’t it strange that the aperture (the opening of the lens) remains the same when you zoom in.? Shouldn’t the aperture change the same way it does at f 2.8 at 18 mm  when you zoom?

I don't think so - the variable aperture is just a physical limit of the lens when wide open.

If you set a specific manual aperture you'd want it to stay the same (if possible) across the zoom range.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aperture is the ratio between the focal length of the lens and the width of the iris (or aperture). So f2 at 18mm means an opening of 9mm. To reduce the size (and cost) of a lens, zoom lenses with longer focal lengths often have variable aperture. Your lens has a max opening of 6.4mm at 18mm (f2.8). To have the same aperture at 55mm the max. opening should be 19.6mm (55 / 2.8). That would result in a wider lens with larger glass elements and subsequently more costs and design issues. Hence the f4 at 55mm. It keeps the lens compact and cost efficient.

The downside of variable aperture is that the exposure changes while zooming in or out, which will need to be compensated by adjusting shutter speed or ISO. Professionals usually don't like that: e.g. a sports photographer being confronted with a longer shutter speed just because of zooming in. Another downside is that depth of field changes when zooming in or out which can lead to subjects being out of focus. Your camera will 'fix' that obviously in AF mode, but for most professionals it may ruin the effect they were looking for. That's why constant aperture zoom lenses are often referred to as 'professional grade lenses' or the 'holy trinity of f2.8 zoom lenses'...

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Herco said:

In fact it does. Whether it is mechanically or electronically I can’t tell, but yeah the ‘pupil’ widens.

Thank you Herco! That is what I think also. I just wonder how it works when you use a manual lens, like Nikkor 80-200 f 4.5.

The aperture (“pupil”) obviously is constant when you zoom. I have to check that!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usually the constant aperture lenses have different kinds of elements and lens groups than do the variable aperture lenses, it is a different design idea. One other side benefit that may matter, is that the lenses often do not extend or retract while zooming.

But try not to get too fixated on the idea, there are plenty of high quality variable aperture lenses out there. Canon makes some “L” grade red banded variable aperture lenses as does Sigma and Tamron and ... Lots of those Leica mount Carl Zeiss lenses, which are the mutterings of legend, are variable aperture builds.

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Hi! Perhaps I need to follow your advice. The problem can be that JPGs containing a mixture of shades and colors are exposed to my liking. The problem arises when there are larger areas of light gray/white, like cloudy sky. I'm a bit surprised that X-T50 cannot expose those more difficult scenes correctly, as I've understood that modern cameras can analyse scenes and expose accordingly. In the past, when I used cameras with simple exposure methods or hand-held exposure meters the situation was different. The meter reading was just a starting point to adjust camera's settings manually. Moreover, cellular phones do not suffer this problem (although the result on the whole is of course inferior). Regards, Tuomas
    • Before I get hazed for not knowing basic photography, I want everyone to know I am sincerely asking because I want to dial in a good formula in camera. I don't particularly like using ND filters for sunsets of the ocean because it usually causes me to dial in a slower shutter, blurring the waves. I want crisp, almost stopped motion if possible. In this past I have used ND on other camera systems with varied success. 2-4 stop is usually good. If there are no rocks in the image, graduated ND works great. Recently, I have been thinking about discarding the ND and going with an in-camera solution in my X-H2 or working with a 2 stop ND and doing the rest in camera.  I used 200 dynamic range, ISO 400, +0.6 EC 1/210s with the Fujinon XF16mmF1.4 R WR at f/16.0 to achieve the attached photo. I've been shooting street at golden hour with 200 dynamic range with a lot of success, so I tried it on a sunset photograph and it worked out well. I think I could have gone +1 exposure compensation or greater and still rescued the highlights. I want to be able to lift the shadows a bit more, but not to the extent of if I had bracketed three images to be post processed for HDR, so I'm going to try 300 dynamic range and see what happens. Has anyone adjusted the tone curve in camera or anything else to achieve a well balanced photograph? Please share.   

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • Yesterday I updated my X-H2S to firmware version 7.20 through the Fujifilm app, and immediately after, the camera stopped working. It powers on but is completely unresponsive. I tried every possible fix: With and without lenses Different lenses Removing battery and cards Force firmware recovery Nothing worked — the camera remains bricked. This body has been carefully handled with very limited use, and it’s just over 2 years old (so out of warranty). Tomorrow I’ll be contacting Fuji support and sending it to the Mississauga, ON service centre. This problem looks very similar to the app-based firmware update issue that Fujifilm publicly acknowledged in January 2023 for other X-series models, where cameras froze after updating via the app. In those cases, Fujifilm accepted responsibility and repaired them at no cost. I’m sure they’re going to charge me a lot of money for this. Do any of you have similar experiences?

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • I've tried shooting jpg in my Fuji cameras and I do not like the results. I find the shadows blocked up and the overall tonality too dark. I always shoot raw except for a couple of times when I've tried raw + jpg as an experiment. Why don't you spend some time adjusting the parameters of your chosen jpg film simulation to better fit your expectations. Increase shadow exposure, for example to reduce the harsh contast. Try a couple of steps at a time to see if you can get output more to your liking.
    • Hi Everyone! I like to continue analyzing as to what I find problematic in X-T50's photometry/exposure measurement. My settings related to this issue are as follows: Film simulation in C (default), Exposure mode Multi (center-weighted, no difference), ISO 500 (increased if there is not enough light for handheld shots), DR400. Mostly I use the aperture-priority autoexposure, aperture at 8, picture quality fine, and for casual/travel photos saved as JPGs (for pictures which I find important I use RAW; I'm _not_ now discussing RAW; I would like to use the HEIC format but Mac's Photos app handles them so so slowly (in contrast to Apple's own HEIC) and Photoshop only recognizes them thorough the RAW editor!). So, I wonder why X-T50 underexposes certain similar kind of scenes, particularly, if the day is relatively bright, but cloudy and there are strongish/some contrasts although the light is dull, for example cloudy sky and dark forest. To me, looking by my eyes, the scene is not that contrasty. The result is a photo, let's say, too dim, the dark parts getting too dark. Of course, it is possible to lighten the photo by increasing exposure manually. The strange thing is that I didn't have this problem with my Nikon D7100. As to other lighting conditions, I find that X-T50 does great job: Colors are nice, photos are crisp and they are nicely exposed. To me, Fujifilm X-T50's photometry programming needs adjustment in situations in which the light is dull but there are strong whitish elements. All comments welcome! Regards, Tuomas
×
×
  • Create New...