Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
On 7/30/2020 at 6:29 AM, Aleksandr_m.f said:

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1486631-REG/venus_optics_fr_fx2_canon_ef_lens_to.html

only this work almost perfect

but fuji lenses give better image quality, have tested ef 135 mm once, xf-90 was much sharper 

That's an unfair comparison, the 135L is known to be a mediocre performer compared to pretty much any fast 135 except the ancient Nikkor 135DC. I would have been shocked if the XF90 hadn't significantly outperformed the 135L. A Sigma 135/1.8 or Zeiss 135/2 will be a completely different story.

Based on my research, the Fringer AF adapter is the way to go, specifically the version II. It gets you access to a number of lenses with no equivalent in native mount. The 400DOII in particular is an enticing option, as are the various xxx-600 zooms.

Edited by mawz
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

Hello, I have just ordered a mount converter from EF to FX, Fringer FR-FX2. (I have X-H1)

I had Canon or Nikon Cameras, and preferred SIGMA lenses.

( This limits AF to work on phase detection focus points, so coverage is almost half for X-H1. )

Already I confirmed my favorite SIGMA 70mm Art macro works with previous model FR-FX1,

and expect old 24mm F1.8 EX DG ASPHERICAL MACRO to work (AF, face/eye detection) with it.

Here you can find the confirmed lens list;

Canon EF to Fujifilm X - Fringer smart adapters (fringeradapter.com)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Today I used Tamron 24-70mm F2.8(A007), and SIGMA Art 70mm macro, through Fringer FR-FX2 (Portrait).

Both lenses are on the list, but I can't say they work perfectly.

Sometimes face/eye detection was lost, let's say, 2-3 shots out of 10, and I needed to wait face detection recovered.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
    • How does one make sure that Fuji's image correction is turned on to correct barrel and pin-cushion distortion on a GFX 100 or GFX100S when using the GF20-35? Is it only applied to the jpegs and not to the raw files? (I was surprised to discover the barrel distortion on the GF 35-70mm lens.) I normally shoot in raw with jpeg back-up and use the raw files, which I convert either in Affinity Photo 2 when editing with that program or in Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 by Silkypix if I wish to process the image in Photoshop CS6. (Adobe DNG is also a possibility.) Thank you for the help. Trevor
×
×
  • Create New...