Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am thinking to grab a X-E3 by this year Christmas but is it worth to buy new E3 or wait for the successor?

Some rumours saying that E3 will not receive an update but I like its weight and size as it matching to they style I shoot (I am mainly on street photography). 
 

new X-Pro 2 & 3 is way out of my budget, so it is tough for me to consider the two. 

 

Please feel free to share your ideas. 
 

Thank you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are happy with the specs, I would say go ahead! I have an X-E3 - along with an X-T2 - and find it to be quite a nice camera with impressive performance! It gives up very little to the X-Pro2 and the X-T2, with which it shares its sensor and processor. It's main deficiency is its lack of weather sealing - a concern here in Oregon, and why I have the X-T2 as well. The touchscreen is not a favorite feature, but it is easy enough to live with.

Just as the X-T3 is not that major of an upgrade over the X-T2 (unless you shoot video), I can't imagine that the next generation of the X-E series would bring much new to the platform. I really can't imagine one buying the X-E or X-Pro camera for serious video work, anyway!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The X-E3 is a reality of today. 

You can certainly wait to buy directly an X-E4, somewhere in 2020 or 2021, and continue to shoot with your actual camera, but, then, the X-T3 would be an X-T4, and probably at the eve of been upgraded to X-T5 ... and it would be then appropriate to wait the next to come X-E5 with so potential wonderful features .... 

I like very much my X-E3 which give me so fine files, and which is so light and discreet with the 27mm pancake. If it would be an X-E4, I’ll gonna see then if it will be really useful for me to upgrade or, as I often do, to wait to the X-E5, upgrading only one time on two. 

But it’s just my way of seeing. ;~)

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/14/2019 at 3:46 AM, rickmayberry said:

It's main deficiency is its lack of weather sealing - a concern here in Oregon, and why I have the X-T2 as well.

I really can't imagine one buying the X-E or X-Pro camera for serious video work, anyway!

Hi rickmayberry,

thanks for the comment. 
 

I only shoot stills and I like the body of X-E3, but my primary concern is also the weather sealed. 
 

I have Canon gears with L lens, and I do not need to worry anywhere I go, I can just shoot. But with X-E3, it may end up with some restrictions. 
 

X-T2 is very DSLR like camera, and more expensive, I wish to try something new. 
 

X-Pro 2 is too expensive and heavy, it basically out of my budget. 
 

It’s a tough choice in Fuji camp. 
 

thanks again. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I definitely prefer the "rangefinder" style of the X-E and X-Pro cameras over the SLR-inspired design of the X-T series. The main reason that I bought the X-T2 over the X-T20 was the weather sealing. Had an X-Pro2 been available at the same price point, I would have certainly bought it instead. Weather permitting, I will grab the X-E3 in a moment over the X-T2. I can easily see a time when an X-Pro will replace the both of them!

Good luck with whatever decision you make!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Zababo said:

The X-E3 is a reality of today. 

You can certainly wait to buy directly an X-E4, somewhere in 2020 or 2021, and continue to shoot with your actual camera, but, then, the X-T3 would be an X-T4, and probably at the eve of been upgraded to X-T5 ... and it would be then appropriate to wait the next to come X-E5 with so potential wonderful features .... 

Hi Zababo,

thanks for the comments. 
 

unfortunately, there is no clear direction yet about the X-E series whether will received an update. 
 

total agreed with you, X-E3 is a “today” camera, and the price is very attractive now especially the 23mm bundle. 
 

Because Fuji will be my second camera as I will still primarily shoot Canon DSLR, this is why it is so tough for me to make up purchase decision. 
 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rickmayberry said:

I definitely prefer the "rangefinder" style of the X-E and X-Pro cameras over the SLR-inspired design of the X-T series. The main reason that I bought the X-T2 over the X-T20 was the weather sealing. Had an X-Pro2 been available at the same price point, I would have certainly bought it instead. Weather permitting, I will grab the X-E3 in a moment over the X-T2. I can easily see a time when an X-Pro will replace the both of them!

Good luck with whatever decision you make!!!

Hi rickmayberry,

thanks again for the comments. 
 

I just bought and X-T30 for my wife for her Christmas gift, it comes with 18-55mm kit lens. She upgraded from X-A5 that purchased last year. Anyway, she is new to photography. 
 

the motivation for me to purchase X-E3 because i am thinking add one prime lens into the kit, and 23mm if the focal length that I always use (~35mm) while I shooting with my Canon DSLR. 

The lens cost around $400, but the bundle price for X-E3 with 23mm is $800, this looks like a great deal. I will save $100 if I purchased separately. 
 

I tested the ax-E3 last year and it feel good on my hand. But this will be my second camera after my Canon DSLR anyway. So it is a tough choice. 
 

Thanks again for your reply. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I certainly think it is worth buying, as I just ordered one yesterday with the 18-55.  I'll swap the lens with the 27mm f/2.8 that I currently have on my x-t20.  Image quality should be the same in an even more compact form factor.  I'm gearing up to put together a good travel kit for an international trip next spring.  I'll take my a7riii for the high res wide angle shots and I plan to carry at least one other body (possibly two) on the trip for the normal and short telephoto shots.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
×
×
  • Create New...