T-Man

I'd like weather sealing in: - 10-24mm f/4 (and, aperture marking) - 27mm f/2.8 (and, aperture ring with marking) - 56mm f/1.2 (Non-APD) And, OIS in: - 16-55mm f/2.8 - 90mm f/2

Thanks yukosteel. I also have the Voigtlander 40mm f1.4 but a Multi-coated copy. It is a fantastic lens. Looking at other people's photos IBELUX certainly introduces a lot of coma; I too think that it will be fantastic in monochrome photography. Cheers!

Dang it! A real let down; FedEx did not deliver even though I had paid for "Overnight" delivery. Aside from Christmas, I have two birthdays (our daughter's and our grandson's) tomorrow and was really looking forward to taking some shots of the cakes, candles, lights, presents, and of course portraits. Hopefully, I'll get the lens tomorrow.

I was looking to buy a Christmas present for myself (technically, from my mother,) and thought about checking out the 35mm f/0.95 from Mitakon and SLR Magic. Instead, I purchased the HandeVision IBELUX 40mm f/0.85 and I should have it in-hand on Christmas Eve. I have 30-days, if I would like to return. Just in case anyone is interested, it is selling at $799.99 these days. I know that the HandeVision IBELUX 40mm f/0.85 has been discussed here and elsewhere extensively in the past, and I have perused some of the threads.The tone and the content of the past dialogues have mostly revolved around Chinese manufacturing, weight and size, lack of autofocus and electronic interface for EXIF, and above all the "price" of $2,000. But now that the lens is selling for drastically low price, I thought it would be good to hear from you folks and especially from those who use or have used this lens. Regards and season's greetings.

I have both 1.2/56 (APD and non-APD,) as well as the 2.4/60. All three are slow to focus, even on X-T1, but 2.4/60 is the slowest. However, once it acquires focus it is normally precise. It has a long focus-ring throw--takes ages to move focus a small distance, I appreciate it during macro work but in other scenarios it is a pain in the wrist. I find the Macro Extension adapters (11mm and 16mm from Fujifilm) a good aid to compensate for 1:2 magnification. I use Cokin PURE Harmonie Ultra Slim filters to avoid vignetting when stacking UV with Cir Polarizer. I do think that 39mm filter thread is sort of an odd size. But since I can throw the same polarizer on 2.8/27 pancake, can't complain too much. Construction-wise, the lens is in alignment with the 1.4/35 or the 2/18. From an image quality standpoint the 2.4/60 is almost perfect. Colors are bright and vivid with good DR contrast. Lots of details in RAW files for PP shadow recovery. However, I feel that it is a bit too clinical for portraits or 'creative-type' work--'sometimes.' Originally I had traded my 2.4/60 towards 1.2/56, but bought it back again after a few months. I don't use either of the three (2.4/60, 1.2/56, & 1.2/56 APD) as dedicated lenses but I do use them often enough that I can justify owning them. For my taste in portraits, either of the two 1.2/56 and the 2/90 are better suited. I would suggest, if I may, that you add a 2.4/60 to your library. I am sure you can find a deal on eBay or Craigslist for one in excellent condition. I've seen some in mint condition listed for $300-$350 at my local camera store. Keep in mind that though the 1.2/56 is heavier than the 2.4/60, it is also stubbier; the 2.4/60 is a bit longer. By the way, try the Metal Hand Grip on your X-T10. I find it useful.

I hope that Fuji includes a button setting that gets one out of Focus Check. A time-out or an exit function. I am referring to Focus Check while in Autofocus mode. If this function is already on, please let me know how to activate it. Thanks.

Thank goodness that it was a joke. Just today fujirumors.com had a post about that. Whew!

If the rumors are true regarding a new sensor with 1.3x crop factor, the attached file compares the effective focal lengths. https://www.dropbox.com/s/0wm891oris5g0df/Fujinon%20FL%20Comparison.jpg?dl=0

I was just being facetious. Yes, the vented hood is the way to go; looks like the hood of Voigtlander VM 'Nokton' Classic. If you fancy to see, here is a picture of mine on X-T1: https://flic.kr/p/zXFgNM Cheers.

The bigger irony is that by complaining about what "umad?" was complaining about, you are complaining. And yes, I too am complaining. Cheers, "milandro."

Haha! Most are family photos, not visible publicly. Should be able to see my public photostream; about 1,500 on Flickr and 1,000 or so on 500px. Cheers.

I am a big gearhead and I have a few setups: ONE 1. 10-24mm f/4 (Often carry 'just' this lens. Full-frame FOV of ~16mm to 35mm makes it very versatile. Extension distortion is well-controlled.) 2. 18-55mm f/2.8-4 (Sharp rendition. Excellent hues and very well balanced contrast for 'brilliant' skin-tones.) 3. 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 (Don't like the compression distortion, but easier to carry compared to the 50-140mm f/2.8.) TWO 1. 16-55mm f/2.8 (Wish it had OIS.) 2. 50-140mm f/2.8 (Brilliant but hefty.) 3. Hoping for an ultra-wide WR zoom. Perhaps a WR 10-24mm f/2.8. THREE 1. 18mm f/2 (I have a love-hate relationship with this lens. Hard to explain, or even comprehend, why. I've had it almost 3 years.) 2. 27mm f/2.8 (Full-frame FOV of 40mm, a bit odd. But what can I say, it is a pancake and I love pancakes.) 3. 35mm f/1.4 (Well, what can I say about this. Perfect lens for X-Trans.) 4. 60mm f/2.4 (Many haters out there. IMO, optically this is one of the best lenses I have used. A bit slow to focus...hey it's a macro.) FOUR 1. 14mm f/2.8 (Had traded-in my older copy for the 16mm f/1.4, but bought it again. This copy's aperture ring is fairly tight and has discernible clicks.) 2. 23mm f/1.4 (Another Fujinon wonders.) 3. 56mm f/1.2 (Low-light portraits, and macro with Macro Extension Adapters.) FIVE 1. 16mm f/1.4 (I have a love-hate relationship with this lens also. Perfect FOV and excellent IQ but too bulky.) 2. 56mm f/1.2 APD (One of my all-time favs. But I'd like replace it with a WR version. So good that I sold my mint+ Rokkor MD 50mm f/1.2.) 3. 90mm f/2 (I've shot with it a handful of times and only for portraiture. Very sharp and beautiful planar transition but fantastic background blur.) 4. 35mm f/2 (I have standing instructions with my camera shop to order/put aside every new release of XF lens.) SIX 1. Zeiss 12mm f/2.8 2. Zeiss 32mm f/1.8 3. Zeiss 50mm f/2.8 SEVEN 1. SLR Magic Hyperprime 23mm f/1.7 2. SLR Magic Hyperprime 35mm t/1.4 3. Lensbaby Velvet 56mm f/1.6 Most of the gear is on my Flickr album 'Photography Arsenal:' https://flic.kr/s/aHsk6xLBs9

Seems VA repair facilities are independent enterprises authorized by Fujifilm Service. I had a few bad pixels on the sensor of my then out-of-warranty X-Pro1. I live in Washington so decided to call Precision Camera Repair in California; they are listed on Fujifilm's support website. I was told by Precision Repair that they [and others like them] only perform limited service, and for pixel remapping I would have to send it to factory repair in NJ. Apparently, Fujifilm does not provide its software-centric diagnostic and service tools to independent enterprises. Anyhow, Fuji repair in NJ charged me ~$125 for servicing the camera and for remapping the pixels. Though I had not asked for, they cleaned the dust out of OVF/EVF and replaced the shutter release button assembly, which was being a bit flimsy. Turnaround time was less than ten calendar-days and the camera felt better to use than when it was brand-new. By the way, this was in 2014. P.S. Here is the link to all the authorized repair facilities: http://www.fujifilmusa.com/support/ServiceSupportProductContent.do?dbid=670694&prodcat=474573&sscucatid=664278

On the other hand, I have nothing but positive experiences with Fujifilm Camera Repair folks. Turn around has been approximately ten calendar-days with shipping, and I received status communiqué at least three times with each repair. I believe Fujifilm only offers one year warranty (extendable to two years, but pricey) to the original [retail] purchaser that unfortunately does not transfer to secondary purchasers. This is a common practice among most manufacturers; have experienced it personally with Canon, Nikon, Panasonic, Olympus, and even Leica. With used items, especially camera gear, I purchase an aftermarket warranty; Mack is affordable and fantastic in my opinion. I do sympathize with you about being "in dark for 3 weeks."

I too am keenly looking forward to the XF f2/35mm; primarily for its 'weatherization' feature. I am a lens collector and just love my OM glass. The Zuiko f1.2/50mm and the f2/100mm are my all time favorites. You are right about the Zuiko f2/50mm Macro. It is a brilliant lens and it is the only Zuiko 50mm variation I don't own. But I am on the look-out for a "mint+" copy with box, manuals, hood, and filter-set. Of course, money is an object! My OM Collection: https://flic.kr/p/xub9Xe My favourite OM glass: https://flic.kr/p/q3MULL

I know I am being a bit selfish since I love shooting with my Leica M/Voightlander VM/Zeiss ZM lenses on the X-Pro1 more than on the M-P 240, perhaps the X-Pro2 can have IBIS and the X-T2 can sport 4k video. Omer...

Thank you for your response. I don't have the GH4, but in the realm of IBIS platforms I own the GX7, E-M1 and A7M2, and in fixed lens the LX100 and RX100M3. They all handle IS real well and I really don't have a huge issue with battery usage by any of them. [Don't take me wrong, I'd welcome any power consumption efficiency. On the Fuji end and another wishlist item of mine--a more accurate battery SOC (state of charge) indicator.] While I second you on the excellent OIS in 18-135 and 10-24, for that matter 18-55 and 55-200 are excellent too, I find the 50-140's OIS implementation to be just phenomenal. The lack of it on 16-55 is a bummer though; still a fantastic lens. I concur with you that the incumbent Fuji lens line-up is not optimized for video, and would require a redesign if Fuji wishes to be a formidable contender in the video world. Regards, Omer...

As stated, it is a crazy wishlist. IBIS does give one jitter-free video and a couple of f-stops worth of advantage, but for me it really comes in handy during manual focussing. Especially, in critical focussing. Cheers.

My crazy wishlist for both X-T2 and X-Pro2: - No advance filters. Just not indicative of Fuji cameras. - IBIS. An absolute imperative. - Better sensor. Increased MP (as on OM-D E-M5 II.) - 3.7MP or better EVF (As on Leica T. Better refresh rate, T's is horrendous.) - GPS (Leica T has it built-in to the external EVF.) - Weatherization on X-Pro2. - Better weatherization and sturdier compartment/port doors on X-T2. - Manual release cable support on the X-T2; would like to use a screw-in soft shutter release. - Broader histogram support. - Expansive and Better interval shooting support - Ability to use friendly names and more custom profile memory banks. Can customize a couple of profiles for each lens. - Ability to backup camera settings to SD card. - Soft switch to engage on-demand or automatically the PIP image. Also in autofocus mode. Especially, in AF+MF mode. - Timeout setting to return camera to full view after focus check while in autofocus mode. - A couple of more Fn buttons. - Vertical grip with EV compensation dial.

Hi Romi- I highly doubt it that you'll run into the same problem. I experienced the problems with the f2/18mm immediately. It was one of the first few Fuji lenses I had purchased and I ignored the "freezes" first few times as user caused error. In fairness, Fuji has been really good to us; both my daughter and I, shoot with X cameras (not exclusively though) and we have every single XF lens there is. The above are the only two problems I have faced. BTW, every once in a while the EVF on my black X-E2 fails to 'kick-in' when the sun is behind me and is directly shining on the EVF sensor. I don't make a big deal out of it but my daughter's silver X-E2 does not act this way; neither does either of the X-T1 cameras nor the X-Pro1. Given that XT-1 and X-Pro1 are different beasts, the only explanation I have come to is the latitude (tolerance) in manufacturing QC; the black X-E2 was purchased in November '14 and the silver in March '15. To reiterate, I am very happy with Fuji's service. Spoke to a Fuji Medical Imaging sales representative at my wife's hospital, he gave me a plausible reasoning for camera errors and freezes as experienced by me: electrical contact short. Since XF lenses are designed to signal aperture setting to the camera, a loose connection (when not clicking and thus, not locking) can cause a short and loss/corruption of data. I find it logical and it does satisfy my inquisitiveness about the experience. Cheers!

No. In fact, very sparingly. The f2/18mm lens started giving me errors within two weeks of purchase; it was replaced. The f1.2/56mm was purchased in February this year.

Thanks, Dis. You are correct; theoretically it is 1 f-stop difference. I could be wrong but from a lay perspective and through experience, I have found that I need to compensate the APD lens by +1.33 to +2ev on the camera to get the same exposure condition at f/1.2 as I would get on the non-APD. By the way, I have found contradicting information on the effect of exposure compensation on depth of field; does it? Will appreciate some insight. Omer...

This was a very pleasant experience in dealing with Fuji repair. Total turnaround time (including shipping) was ten days. Fuji replaced the aperture assembly and the mount. In my opinion the aperture is no longer as loose as it was. Omer...