Jump to content

Recommended Posts

When I shot portraits with a view-camera in the ‘90, I started using the camera movements, changing the direction of the focused plane and limiting the aperture, in order to isolate parts of the subject while, on purpose, leaving out of focus other parts of the subject.

 

Back then this was very “ hip" and achievable mostly with large format cameras and small number of medium format and small format cameras, generally by using a special bellows.

 

Apparently this effect is still, to this day, rather “ hip” and a brand, “lensbaby”, practically was built around this concept.

 

You can achieve a similar thing if you manage to get hold of a macro bellows with tilt and shift functions ( not easy or cheap to find)  and by means of an adapter try to mount it on your modern digital camera.

 

Yes, I hear you thinking, you can do something that looks a bit like this also in post production. But I don’t intend to talk about it ( but by all means feel free to do and discuss it somewhere else opening your own thread about it if you so wish! ;) )

 

A similar effect can be reached by using the built in “ miniature” effect in your camera.

 

Yes there are some limitations to it ( shoot only jpg or not being able to position the sharpness on a diagonal line and of course it works only in a bi-dimensional way! ), nevertheless it is a different way to use this effect , quickly and without having to buy anything else that the camera that you have already.

 

The effect puts a blurred band directly above and under the part that is sharpened. Fortunately on the X-T1 camera this varies depending whether you are shooting a vertical or horizontal picture and the effect turns with the camera. Also you can position the autofocus anywhere and the blurred band will still be just above and just under the point where you are shooting.

 

There are several things that one could ask fuji to do to make this effect more usable to this purpose ( varying the position of the blurred bands in a circle, modifying the width and the intensity of the blurring, adding a customizable vignetting effect, do this in Raw, apply film simulation to it..................whatever! ) but I don’t engage in the kind of threads where people start fantasizing on what they wish Fuji would do for them.

 

I’d rather use what there is.

 

This is an example of the unadulterated effect, it is possible by PP to add a lot more to it but I just wanted to show what you can do “ in camera”.

 

Please use at will and show your results.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always loved this effect, and although the Lensbaby doesn't do it quite as well as some of the tilt shift options out there, it is a cool effect.

 

I was just reading an article about free-lensing yesterday and how you can use that to achieve this effect also, however that makes me nervous, especially on our mirrorless cameras where the sensor is exposed the entire time you are working the lens.

 

Thanks for pointing this out...

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, I too a look! I am afraid that this free-lensing is not for me!
 
I am still recovering from the shock that I got with my first Fuji XE-1 and the problem that “ oil”spots  and dust caused on the sensor ( cleaning was done by Fuji Germany took two weeks and then the camera came back with different dirt than it originally had).
 
So, NO freelensing for me, also because I have a condition with my hands that would probably lead to drop the lens if I fiddle around that way with it!
 
Anyway the lensbaby  thing can get very expensive if you do it with a proper lens with a good aperture like the Edge 80.

 

I am trying to find a cheap Tilt-shift bellows but I am afraid that unless I come across someone who knows absolutely nothing about these rare beasts that ain’t going to happen because they want as much as the lens baby would cost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL.  Free-Lensing makes me nervous as well.  I am going to play around with this effect though.  I do believe we have a member here that has quite a collection of Tilt Shift adapters, perhaps they will chime in..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok this is a Kipon tilt 135mm 2.8 ( at f4) Tokina There is a big difference with the miniature effect 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Obviously you haven’t noticed that I have given examples of both and the fact that I own a kipon adapter.

 

If you are doing this only for fun and incidentally and the effect is what I’ve shown above, an effect for which you need not spending a penny since this is a feature built in your camera you might not invest in yet more gear ( I know that is not your problem, but other folks are not like you).

 

Obviously, as you can see from the examples given above, I do infer that the kipon is a better and more versatile solution but it costs more money.

 

So, That’s why.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I was replying to the original poster, not you. That said, I'm surprised you bothered to comment given I was supporting your comment.

 

As to why you would reject the in-camera approach, well 1) you can shoot in raw 2) you can adjust the amount and location of the tilt 3) there's no other changes made to the file (eg. Higher contrast and saturation) 4) if I wanted Instagram I'd use a phone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • All three of my bodies (X-E2, X-T4, GFX100S II) have shoot without lenses enabled and they have all had it set since I bought them.  No harm in it at all. Just remember to set the focal length when you fit a manual lens with no electronics otherwise the IBIS (if you have it) goes nuts. I regularly use vintage film lenses from Minolta, Zeiss, Mamiya, Rollei and others on my X mounts along with more modern manual focus stuff from TTArtisans. I also use Nikon AF-S lenses with a Fringer so the world is your oyster! Vintage lenses can be an absolute bargain too - For example the Zeiss 135 f/35 in M42 is as cheap as chips and very sharp as is the excellent Minolta 35-70 Macro (which is also rebadged Leica). 
    • I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • Hy there When Im using the fan001 on the XH2s and I flip the LCD Screen vertically by 180 degrees then the image flips vertically, what is good but it also flips horizontally. The clean feed on HDMI is not flipping horizontally but its also flipping if the HDMI output info display is on. When I unmount the fan then the image flips only vertically. My firmware is updated to the latest version. Any ideas if there is a fix for that?
    • In reply to the original question, it all depends on what you mean by infrared.  If you mean "see thermal information", then I agree with the comments here.  However, if you mean near-infrared, the X-T4, or basically any digital camera can be modified to "see" it.  Check out Lifepixel.com and Kolarivision.com for more info. As regards lenses, I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • No - I don’t think so - it means you can take pictures if you remove the lens completely - but I’m not sure that is a problem
×
×
  • Create New...