Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,

does anyone ever bought or tried the MegaGear Case for X-T1 + 18-55m?

 

http://www.amazon.it/gp/product/B00KIN8ON4/ref=s9_wish_gw_d36_g23_i5?ie=UTF8&colid=1A3MQJKMF3SUS&coliid=I39SPRYBPTA0JB&pf_rd_m=A11IL2PNWYJU7H&pf_rd_s=desktop-1&pf_rd_r=176SDC6PCJANEWT5J12N&pf_rd_t=36701&pf_rd_p=577208427&pf_rd_i=desktop

 

I was thinking about that because it seems really minimal and robust for the X-T1 kit setup. I excluded half cases, because I like that the lens is fully protected within the camera body. The only concern could be the front lens cover that would be hanging when you want to keep the camera ready around your neck, but I think it could be removed during the shooting.

 

Any opinions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The new version of the “ Ever ready case “ which in the past was called the “ Never ready case” ( when it was provided as standard with all cameras and almost no one ever used them)

 

This is one of the so many Chinese PU covers ( made of very thin leather on a synthetic material), there are identical but cheaper ones too around.

 

(If you look on Aliexpress you will find hundreds and if you buy one for less than €20, including shipment, you won’t pay any customs when it gets to you in Italy)

 

Yes, the top certainly can be removed and then you will be standing there with this thing in your hands not knowing where to put it while you are supposed to be shooting.

 

Also the lower part of the case arrangement offers NO access to batteries or card, while offering only a minimum of impact protection.

 

If you must have some for of protection for your camera with one lens alone, you are probably better off with some for of “ holster” hanging off a strap or if you prefer (I don’t) on the side somehow (there are many solutions).

 

 

Take a look at this LINK ( click on the L)  amazon of course at the bottom of this specific product there are many more alternatives.

 

The holster ( you can have it hanging off the neck or the side) makes you keep the camera body in it and you extract it to shoot ( you can practice being your “ drawing”, the fastest in Tuscany!  ^_^ ), then you put it back in there after using..

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are really many, mostly inexpensive, of those holsters on the market, in all sorts of materials and colors, from conspicuous to relatively inconspicuous.

 

Personally, even if you are going around with the sole body and zoom, there are very good things to be said about small bags ( I prefer real leather for example ).

 

You may have an holster ( many types really) with a belt on the hip and inside a camera with only a wrist strap. I don’t generally like wrist straps to carry cameras all the time but in this configuration I can understand its use and comfort.

 

I also don’t like to carry an unprotected camera around as some folks do with their across the chest slings or spider holsters.

 

If I were to carry a camera like that I would prefer something closed and then a wrist strap inside or one of those straps which go as a sort of glove around your hand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
    • How does one make sure that Fuji's image correction is turned on to correct barrel and pin-cushion distortion on a GFX 100 or GFX100S when using the GF20-35? Is it only applied to the jpegs and not to the raw files? (I was surprised to discover the barrel distortion on the GF 35-70mm lens.) I normally shoot in raw with jpeg back-up and use the raw files, which I convert either in Affinity Photo 2 when editing with that program or in Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 by Silkypix if I wish to process the image in Photoshop CS6. (Adobe DNG is also a possibility.) Thank you for the help. Trevor
×
×
  • Create New...