Jump to content

Recommended Posts

When I first got my XT-2 one of the things I complained about was the higher contrast in the EVF . After a while I got use to it and realized the exposed file would look great.

Today I was shooting a event indoors ISO 8000 and the contrast all of a sudden was too low. When I reviewed the image on the rear display it looks fine.

I had accidentally changed the white balance  to Underwater, but that wasn't the problem. When I corrected it nothing changed in the viewfinder. 

I was shooting with the 55 - 200 and I forgot my lens hood. I suspected the overhead fluorescents could be the issue but when I switched to the  18 -55 the image  still looked like I was looking through dirty glasses (I was )  but that was not the issue. 

I was shooting during the day , outside, and it was bright & sunny here in Arizona . Everything looked fine

I searched the menu to find if I may have accidentally changed a setting but the EVF brightness was still set on Auto. I did try setting it manually but the image still looked flat. I could not find a setting for contrast.

Any suggestions ?  I'm writing this at night and have not checked the daylight contrast since it was OK this morning (BTW the underwater White balance setting had a nice look to it)

Thanks in advance for help...… Bob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sharkey4711,

Confession; By the time I finished the post it seemed like the problem cleared up...…… I did not know what I did ,if anything, to resolve it.

Today I was shooting under the exact same conditions and before the shoot I cleaned the UV filter, that I keep on the camera. All worked fine except I did something else to the camera.

I usually shoot with no review (chimping) with only the EVF & eye sensor. I occasionally will push the rear screen review button and check the image, but tonight the screen remained blank and the review was only shown in the EVF. Again this had never happened before, so I changed the view mode and looked for something I could have accidentally switched. Nothing was obvious but after toggling a few menu items things came back to normal...….. I have no Idea what I did to cause or correct it.

In one of my first post , I listed what I did not like about the X-T2 and one was the many settings. But as was suggested in the replies, I would learn them as I used the camera. And that was right. After  a year and a half I have found most of my control errors are caused by accidentally moving a dial, and I recover quickly. 

Still love this camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...