Jump to content

Inexpensive macro option for X pro - adapter and lens combo

Qualistat

By Qualistat
in Adapting lenses to Fuji X

 Share

Recommended Posts

Qualistat Apprentice

Qualistat

Posted
Posted

I would love to have the option to  take some macro images with my X pro cameras ( 1&2) I don't really want to buy a macro lens that I will use a couple times a year.

 

What options are their for older lenses and adapters - even extension tubes on existing lenses.

 

I've been doing this a long time, but never got into macro, so some suggestions would be great.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
mbashtan Newbie

mbashtan

Posted
Posted

It definitely would be better to use real macro lens, even old one (also auto-focus is not really useful in this case).

 

You could buy Canon FD 50mm Macro with tubes for 50$ + adapter - basically same price as for Macro Extension Tubes MCEX-11 / MCEX-16.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ruby.monkey Rookie

ruby.monkey

Posted
Posted (edited)

My solution is a Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Adaptall-II (model 72B) which gives me 1:1 magnification and a comfortable working distance for just under £90.

 

Doesn't have the same reputation as the earlier 90mm f/2.5, so prices tend to stay low.

 

(Edit: some details here)

 

On my X-T1:

28979766455_e51873380a_c.jpg

strawberry by Jean-Yves, on Flickr

 

28979766685_5250ca9c2c_c.jpg

greenongreen by Jean-Yves, on Flickr

Edited by ruby.monkey
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
r_kt Contributor

r_kt

Posted
Posted

I use the 27mm and macro tube Fuji 11. Does what I need. And picked up a cheap macro ring light that can operate as a flash and led light.

 

I just need it for the odd close up, quasi macro.

 

But 1:1 is really cool

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • jerryy
      Fungus

      By jerryy · Posted

      A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • Don Barar
      LUT doesn't works on resolve

      By Don Barar · Posted

      The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • PoorAlchemist
      LUT doesn't works on resolve

      By PoorAlchemist · Posted

      I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Don Barar
      LUT doesn't works on resolve

      By Don Barar · Posted

      Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • crazyfields
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By crazyfields · Posted

      Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...