Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I love my new X-T20 but it is useless outside in any lighting other than dull.

The image in the evf is hardly visible to even frame, never mind focus, especially with wider angle lenses.

Put the old black cloth over your head if you remember your 5x4 days and its great.

 

Does anyone have any ideas for a very efficient eyecup, be it home made whatever, as long as it works

 

I am currently on holiday in the sun and I have resorted to a large black sombrero which works quite well, but its not tye thing I wish to be wearing all day.

 

Michael.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest mikEm13

I can't find it now but I read somewhere that the eyecups that fit the X-T!/X-T2 also fit the X-T20. A call or email to Fuji maybe to find out for sure?

Edited by mikEm13
Link to post
Share on other sites

No they don't fit on the X-T20.

Have you tried changing the brightness of the evf? The auto function is often too dark in the bright sunlight. Iam fine with changing the brightness via the q menu and maybe holding my left hand to have a better view.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have my evf setup so the image I see in the evf is exactly the same as the Raw file when I

open it in lightroom, makes exposing and highlight and shadow management so accurate.

 

I did read about an adaptor that allows the Nikon DK 19 eyecup to fit, looks good but I dont know

whether it will stay put on the camera.

Anyone used this device?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That eyecup will cover half of the rear LCD!  Wouldn't it also permanently cover the eye sensor?

The gent above is telling you to change the brightness of the EVF, not to set anything else differently.  You can still view your photos with zero processing in the EVF.



 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not want to increase the brightness of the evf because it defeats the whole purpose of WYSIWYG

 

With the evf calibrated to lightroom the brightness and contrast, shadow and highlight detail is what I will see in the Raw file when I open it in lightroom.

 

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried to use polarising filter on the lenses today with the sun at 90 to the camera, what a waste of time. There was no way I could see any darkening effect on the skies, I was luvky to be abke to see an image in the evf.

I took the polariser off the lens, adjusted it by holding it in my hand, then held the filter against the front of the lens to take the shot.

 

Come on fuji, there has to be a better solution other than buy a second XT2 and ditch the xt20

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...