Jump to content

Need some feedback from and Old Fuji lover…

Usaftrevor87

By Usaftrevor87
in General Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

Usaftrevor87 Newbie

Usaftrevor87

Posted
Posted

Long story short. I started photography as a hobby in High School. Did it as a side gig through college. Then got a “real” job and life, kids, etc got in the way. I’m in a position to pick the hobby back up, but I’ve been out of the game so long I feel like my head is spinning. I exited the game with a used X-t3.  
I think I’m mainly settled on a used X-t5 body($1450) or used/new X-s20. I read all the reviews, watch the YouTube videos and my main question is, is the X-t5 worth the update?

What am I shooting? Glad you asked haha

Travel Camera (not concerned about size or weight TBH, travel like camping, road trips, etc),  kids sports, nature, landscape. 
I’m leaning X-t5 for the WR and upgraded processor but I’m open to suggestions. Budget is $1500 for body only but would like less than that if possible. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
BobJ Community Regular

BobJ

Posted
Posted

The x-t5 is certainly an upgrade on the x-t3, not least of which is the bigger battery, but it really is difficult to advise you. The x-s20 is ergonomically a very different camera to the x-t5. It is so important to feel comfortable with a camera. Is there a camera dealer that you could visit to try them out? Another thing is that the x-s20 is 26mp and the x- t5 is 40mp. If you don't want to make big prints it is no advantage in having 40mp.

Link to post
Share on other sites
thelostkiwi Contributor

thelostkiwi

Posted
Posted (edited)

Can't agree about the increased pixel count only being useful if you print big prints. 

It also gives the ability to crop the image giving the 45MP sensor an effective 1.3x zoom with no loss of pixels compared to the 26MP sensor. 

For travel purposes it's a worthwhile thing as it reduces the size/number of lenses needed to achieve like images. 

 

For the OP it will depend a lot on your skill level and intended usage. 

The X-T5 is more oriented to photography with all the normal controls exposed on the top plate whereas the X-S20 is more video oriented with photography controls tucked away more. 

Edited by thelostkiwi
Link to post
Share on other sites
jerryy Grand Master

jerryy

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, thelostkiwi said:

…

It also gives the ability to crop the image giving the 45MP sensor an effective 1.3x zoom with no loss of pixels compared to the 26MP sensor. 

For travel purposes it's a worthwhile thing as it reduces the size/number of lenses needed to achieve like images. 

…

This is playing into the megapixel myth a bit.

The sensors’ sizes (dimensions) are almost identical, the higher resolution is coming from using smaller pixels, which can lead to less dynamic range, more noise and diffraction. It is possible in some cases to get more detail, but the benefits are limited. Otherwise, those high resolution cell phone cameras would have made all of these cameras so obsolete, no one would use them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
lisa Apprentice

lisa

Posted
Posted

Based on your needs and preferences, I recommend the X-T5. It offers an outstanding balance of features, performance, and durability. If you can find a used X-T5 within your budget, you might be able to save some money without compromising on quality. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Neil Rosenberg
      Infrared Photography on X-E2 665nm

      By Neil Rosenberg · Posted

      I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • Neil Rosenberg
      Infrared

      By Neil Rosenberg · Posted

      In reply to the original question, it all depends on what you mean by infrared.  If you mean "see thermal information", then I agree with the comments here.  However, if you mean near-infrared, the X-T4, or basically any digital camera can be modified to "see" it.  Check out Lifepixel.com and Kolarivision.com for more info. As regards lenses, I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • Greybeard
      XS10 and manual lenses

      By Greybeard · Posted

      No - I don’t think so - it means you can take pictures if you remove the lens completely - but I’m not sure that is a problem
    • mcewena
      XS10 and manual lenses

      By mcewena · Posted

      I bought a manual lens over xmas and it took me a while to find the "shutter w/o lens" function in the menu settings.  So far I haven't found a way to either put that on the Q menu or marry that setting to one of the 4 custom modes.   Am I missing something? Is there a problem if I just leave that setting enabled even when the OEM auto lens is in place? tia
    • Greybeard
      Apple Support for Compressed RAF files

      By Greybeard · Posted

      It appears that Apple now (at last!) fully supports FujiFilm Lossless and Compressed RAF files. In the latest updates of MacOS Tahoe 26.2, iOS 26 and iPadOS 26 compressed files are supported in Finder/Files and the Photos app. Good news for those of us with Macs and iPads.
×
×
  • Create New...