Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I recently bought a X PRO 2. I really love the OVF, but in hard light conditions I prefer the EVF.

As I'm wearing glasses I'm not able to see the whole frame in the EVF.

Wouldn't it be great if we could change the magnification of the EVF (5 to 10% less, a bit more black border) so people who wear glasses could so the whole frame.

Maybe something to propose to fuji for a firmware update?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pardon me if I ask: “ Why don’t you just use the dioptric correction provided by Fuji and forget the glasses?”.

 

That’s why the dioptric correction it is there ( in any camera featuring it). Because they know that wearing glasses will reduce view, so they provide you with the means to not wear glasses while you are taking pictures.

 

Extra magnification however is more an hardware than a software matter, so, don’t hold your breath waiting for a firmware which would augments magnification.

 

I really don’t think it is possible to change the magnification by software, unless you change resolution and show only part of the image ( which will be a very myopic thing to do, since they did so much to increase it!).

 

You cannot even make the EVF bigger because otherwise the camera size will grow larger then a MF and the point of having a small sensor in a small camera would be even more defeated than it is now already being the X-Pro 2 a rather large camera with a small sensor.

 

http://fujifilm-x.com/it/x-stories/advanced-hybrid-multi-viewfinder-of-x-pro2-part2/

 

“...The X-Pro2 saw a major advancement from X-Pro1 in all aspect. Needless to say, the X-Pro2's Hybrid Multi Viewfinder is no exception. It underwent an extensive review and was built with a new design. The optical unit, electronic device, mechanical construction and etc. all now have new parts.

Among them, the advancement of the electronic device is quite remarkable.
Thanks to the X Trans CMOS III and X Processor Pro, we can now fully utilize the the high performance of the LCD panel. The improvement in resolution, frame rate, and display response are huge. Just a few years back, people debated whether EVF will ever replace OVF. If you look into the X-Pro2's EVF, then you will know that we are now in a different age.

 

There is a dilemma however. The optical design becomes more challenging with the advancement of the LCD panel. With the ability to display higher resolution, the optical performance also needs to be improved. It is the same logic as a lens would become obsolete with the advancement in sensor's ability to achieve higher resolution.

It is easier for the lens to keep up with the high resolution sensor. There is always a way to make higher performance lens by making the lens barrel bigger. But we cannot do the same for the finder. It has to fit within the camera body size.

So the size should remain the same, but the resolution should become higher, and there shouldn't be a distortion. To achieve this, we review and redesign the optical unit.
To be specific, we achieved it by replacing the glass material of the half prism with even higher high refractive index and by adding an aspherical lens to the eyepiece. And to go with the change, lens construction has also been renewed for the objective lens and LCD panel...."

 
Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

That's one reason I bought the X-T2, is I too wear spectacles, just one of the reasons for dumping Nikon because they insist in using crappy eye relief VFs. Sadly I have yet to see a Rangefinder type camera that has a decent VF eye relief. I believe that I should be able to use specs AND a viewfinder.

The eye relief on the X-T2 is I believe 23mm, I don't know what the ER of the X-Pro2 is?

Only a little rant!

 

PS X-Pro2 eye relief is 15mm according to the Fujifilm specifications!

Edited by Mike G
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Pardon me if I ask: “ Why don’t you just use the dioptric correction provided by Fuji and forget the glasses?”.

 

That’s why the dioptric correction it is there ( in any camera featuring it). Because they know that wearing glasses will reduce view, so they provide you with the means to not wear glasses while you are taking pictures...

 

 

If I am walking around taking pictures I don't want to have to remove my glasses each time I take a photo; especially if the photo opportunities happen quickly. I noticed the same issue with the T1 when the EVF was set to the largest magnification, and my solution was to move the camera slightly with it up to my eye. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used the T1 as an example of a camera that displays five magnification levels on the EVF.

 

My Pro2 can display three levels of magnification on the EVF. Regular shooting, and two for MF. There is no reason why Fuji couldn't add an option to display the EVF at say 90% magnification to help glasses wearers..

Edited by darngooddesign
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Pardon me if I ask: “ Why don’t you just use the dioptric correction provided by Fuji and forget the glasses?”.

 

That’s why the dioptric correction it is there ( in any camera featuring it). Because they know that wearing glasses will reduce view, so they provide you with the means to not wear glasses while you are taking pictures.

 

Some of us have eyesight that is so bad that the diopter correction is inadequate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of us have eyesight that is so bad that the diopter correction is inadequate.

I'm in the same situation. As a spectacle wearer, I am swithering over whether or not to buy the X-pro2, as the viewfinder is borderline for me, in that I have to move the camera slightly when it's up to my eye, to enable me to see the info round the edges. I have the XT2, which is great, but would like a second body, and love the form factor of the X-Pro2. Oddly, the viewfinder of the X100T is marginally better for me, with my specs on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m sorry to hear that, however it is maybe possible to add a lens made to this purpose, the X pro 1 did offer this possibility.

Don't think a screw-in diopter lens is possible for the X-Pro2, if that's what you meant. I have a -3 diopter that I used with the X-Pro1, but my right has deteriorated marginally, and that takes me beyond the -3 maximum built-in correction on the X-Pro2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe not a screw in but you may find a competent optician (believe it or not some are still out there) who is able to make you a lens and and insert it inside a slide on cap to fit an X-Pro-2 ocular.

 

The lens holder could be a slide one with a O ring or something like this 3D printed ocular made by someone for a X-E camera ( although they are different the principle would stand for an ocular on a X pro 2 too) .

 

maxresdefault.jpg

 

Other possibilities are getting inspired by other people whom found solutions for other Fujis, such as X-T10

 

hqdefault.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

 

I recently bought a X PRO 2. I really love the OVF, but in hard light conditions I prefer the EVF.
As I'm wearing glasses I'm not able to see the whole frame in the EVF.
Wouldn't it be great if we could change the magnification of the EVF (5 to 10% less, a bit more black border) so people who wear glasses could so the whole frame.
Maybe something to propose to fuji for a firmware update?

 

 

 

 

The way I’ve always read the original post (which I am re-quoting here)  is that Op wants a smaller image than the one offered normally.

 

I have a X-T1 the X-T1 enlarges the image (zooming in or out)  but doesn’t make it smaller.

 

We have a standard magnification and starting from that you can zoom in, but, at most, you can zoom back to the standard magnification but not less that , if you can make the image smaller than standard magnification on the X-T1 you either have another camera or I never found that function.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...